Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 688

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ESPEN endorsed recommendations. Definition and classification of intestinal failure in adults

Open access
Pironi, Loris, Arends, Jann, Baxter, Janet, Bozzetti, Federico, Peláez, Rosa Burgos, Cuerda, Cristina, Forbes, Alastair, Gabe, Simon, Gillanders, Lyn, Holst, Mette, Jeppesen, Palle Bekker, Joly, Francisca, Kelly, Darlene, Klek, Stanislaw, Irtun, Øivind, Olde Damink, SW, Panisic, Marina, Rasmussen, Henrik Højgaard, Staun, Michael, Szczepanek, Kinga, Van Gossum, André, Wanten, Geert, Schneider, Stéphane Michel, Shaffer, Jon·2015·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Intestinal failure (IF) is not included in the list of PubMed Mesh terms, as failure is the term describing a state of non functioning of other organs, and as such is not well recognized. No scientific society has yet devised a formal definition and classification of IF. The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism guideline committee endorsed its "home artificial nutrition and chronic IF" and "acute IF" special interest groups to write recommendations on these issues. METHODS: After a Medline Search, in December 2013, for "intestinal failure" and "review"[Publication Type], the project was developed using the Delphi round methodology. The final consensus was reached on March 2014, after 5 Delphi rounds and two live meetings. RESULTS: The recommendations comprise the definition of IF, a functional and a pathophysiological classification for both acute and chronic IF and a clinical classification of chronic IF. IF was defined as "the reduction of gut function below the minimum necessary for the absorption of macronutrients and/or water and electrolytes, such that intravenous supplementation is required to maintain health and/or growth". CONCLUSIONS: This formal definition and classification of IF, will facilitate communication and cooperation among professionals in clinical practice, organization and management, and research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.08.017

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

See all 688

Metadata

Authors
Pironi, L., Arends, J., Baxter, J., Bozzetti, F., Peláez, R. B., Cuerda, C., Forbes, A., Gabe, S., Gillanders, L., Holst, M., Jeppesen, P. B., Joly, F., Kelly, D., Klek, S., Irtun, Ø., Olde Damink, S., Panisic, M., Rasmussen, H. H., Staun, M., Szczepanek, K., Van Gossum, A., Wanten, G., Schneider, S. M., & Shaffer, J.
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
171-180
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138378318
Cited by
688
References
41
FWCI
27.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ESPEN endorsed recommendations. Definition and classification of intestinal failure in adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.clnu.2014.08.017
The paper
Pironi, L., Arends, J., Baxter, J., Bozzetti, F., Peláez, R. B., Cuerda, C., Forbes, A., Gabe, S., Gillanders, L., Holst, M., Jeppesen, P. B., Joly, F., Kelly, D., Klek, S., Irtun, Ø., Olde Damink, S., Panisic, M., Rasmussen, H. H., Staun, M., . . . Shaffer, J. (2015). ESPEN endorsed recommendations. Definition and classification of intestinal failure in adults. Clinical Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2014.08.017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.