Dynapenic abdominal obesity as predictor of mortality and disability worsening in older adults: A 10-year prospective study
Open accessAbstract
Unlabelled There are relatively few prospective studies evaluating the combined effect of abdominal obesity and low muscle strength on worsening disability and on mortality. The study aimed at evaluating prospectively the prognostic value of dynapenic abdominal obesity definition on disability worsening in a 5.5-year follow-up and mortality in a 10-year follow-up.Methods In 93 men and 169 women aged between 66 and 78 years, leg isometric strength, waist circumference (WC), BMI, glycemia, HOMA, lipid profile, vitamin D3, albumin, fibrinogen, physical activity level, income, smoking status and comorbidities were evaluated at the baseline. Reported disabilities were measured at baseline, 1-y, 2-y, 3-y and 5.5-y follow-up and mortality rate was evaluated during a 10-y follow-up. The study population was categorized in dynapenic abdominal obese (D/AO), nondynapenic abdominal obese (ND/AO), dynapenic nonabdominal obese (D/NAO), nondynapenic nonabdominal obese (ND/NAO) according to muscle strength/WC tertiles.Results D/NAO subjects presented a disability worsening risk of 1.69 times (95%CI:1.11-2.57), ND/AO subjects showed a 2-fold increase in risk (95%CI:1.34-2.98), while being D/AO more than trebled the risk, even after considering confounding variables (HR:3.39,95%CI:1.91-6.02). Mortality risk after adjustment for other confounding variables was 1.57 (95%CI:1.16-2.13) for ND/AO and 2.46 (95%CI:1.34-4.52) for D/AO.Conclusions Dynapenic abdominal obese subjects are at higher risk of worsening disability and mortality than subjects with dynapenia or central fat distribution only.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reduced leg isometric strength and increased waist circumference are associated with increased mortality (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.34-4.52).
“reduced leg isometric strength and increased waist circumference were associated with increased mortality232 (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.34–4.52)”
From Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: aetiology, epidemiology and treatment strategies (2018) · cites this paper as [232]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 89
- Authors
- Rossi, A. P., Fantin, F., Caliari, C., Zoico, E., Mazzali, G., Zanardo, M., Bertassello, P., Zanandrea, V., Micciolo, R., & Zamboni, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Verona (IT)
- University of Trento (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Rossi, Andrea P.
- Venue
- Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 199-204
- ISSN
- 0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023879724
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 6.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Keywords
- dynapenia, muscle strength, waist circumference, disability progression, mortality, older adults, central fat distribution, prognostic factors, sarcopenia
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Triglycerides, Vitamin D, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Muscle Strength, Waist Circumference, Obesity, Abdominal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review