Probiotic supplementation for management of cardiovascular risk factors in adults with type II diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background & aims The effectiveness of probiotics in control of hypertension and dyslipidemia in diabetic patients remains unclear. Therefore, we systematically reviewed relevant data to elucidate the effects of probiotics on blood pressure and lipid profile of type 2 diabetic patients.Methods We searched PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses databases until May 2016. The primary outcomes were systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG). Other biochemical response and adverse effects were considered as secondary outcomes. Data was extracted from included studies and pooled in meta-analysis whenever possible (both standardized mean difference (SMD) analysis and weighted mean difference (WMD) analysis were performed).Results Eleven eligible randomized controlled trial (n = 641) were identified. Pooling data from these trials demonstrated probiotic consumption significantly decreased SBP (WMD, -3.28 mmHg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -5.38 to -1.18), DBP (WMD, -2.13 mmHg; 95% CI, -4.5 to 0.24), LDL-C (WMD, 8.32 mg/dl; 95% CI, -15.24 to -1.4), TC (WMD, -12.19 mg/dl; 955 CI -17.62 to -6.75) and TG (WMD, -24.48 mg/dl; 95% CI, -33.77 to -11.18) in type 2 diabetic patients compared with placebo. The methodological quality varied across trials included in this study.Conclusion This systematic review suggests probiotics supplementation may be helpful for control of dyslipidemia and hypertension in type 2 diabetic patients. Conducting more trails with large sample size and long follow-up time still is necessary to develop clinical practice guidelines for management of cardiovascular risk factors in patient with type 2 diabetes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Administration of probiotics can improve markers of cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension and dyslipidemia.
“On the other hand, it has been shown that the administration of probiotic markers of cardiovascular diseases can be improved, including hypertension [148] and dyslipidemia [149,150].”
From The Potential Impact of Probiotics on Human Health: An Update on Their Health-Promoting Properties (2024) · cites this paper as [148]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 122
- Authors
- Hendijani, F., & Akbari, V.
- Affiliations
- Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Akbari, Vajihe
- Venue
- Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 532-541
- ISSN
- 0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2589592281
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pharmaceutical Research Center (Grant number 295082)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Keywords
- probiotics, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, blood pressure, lipid profile, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, cardiovascular risk factors, dietary supplementation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Dietary Supplements, Probiotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review