Cited by 45Celiac Disease Research and ManagementChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesEosinophilic Esophagitis

Assessment of dietary compliance in celiac children using a standardized dietary interview

Wessels, Margaretha M.S., te Lintelo, Marije, Vriezinga, Sabine L., Putter, Hein, Hopman, Erica G., Mearin, M. Luisa·2018·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background & aims Compliance to a gluten free diet (GFD) in celiac disease (CD) is ideally assessed by dietary interviews, albeit time-consuming. Short dietary questionnaires have been developed for adults but not for children. Primary aim was to compare GFD compliance in celiac children, measured by a short dietary questionnaire against a dietary interview. Secondary aims were correlation between both questionnaires and celiac antibodies and identifying variables predicting noncompliance. Methods Between 2012 and 2014, participants in the E-health CoelKids study, completed a short dietary questionnaire and standardized dietary interview together with measurement of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (TG2A). Results of the questionnaires were assigned under similar categories. Factors possibly influencing dietary compliance were recorded. Where appropriate, Pearson's Chi-square test for trend, unpaired t-test, Cohen's kappa and one-way ANOVA were used. Results 151 of 165 participating patients were studied, 66% were female. Mean age was 11.3 years (2-26, SD 5.4), mean age at CD diagnosis was 4.9 years (1-23, SD 4.0). The short questionnaire and dietary interview correlated poorly, detecting problems in dietary adherence in 14% and 52% of the patients, respectively (Cohen's kappa 0.034). Only the short questionnaire correlated with TG2A (p = 0.003). Only older age was associated with noncompliance, the mean age of completely nonadherent, adherent but committing errors, an…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.04.010

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Short dietary questionnaires and serum TGA determinations fail to detect dietary transgressions in children and adolescents with celiac disease, showing poor sensitivity to identify all patients who consume gluten.

    “Short dietary questionnaires and TGA determinations in serum fail to detect dietary transgressions in children and adolescents with CD, showing poor sensitivity to identify all patients who consume gluten (51-53).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wessels, M. M. S., te Lintelo, M., Vriezinga, S. L., Putter, H., Hopman, E. G., & Mearin, M. L.
Affiliations
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
1000-1004
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2607363207
Cited by
45
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universiteit Leiden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Keywords
celiac disease, children, gluten-free diet, dietary adherence, dietary questionnaire, anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies, non-compliance, adolescents, age as risk factor
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Celiac Disease, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Patient Compliance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Diet, Gluten-Free

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review