Cited by 45Nutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyDietetics, Nutrition, and Education

Risk factors of refeeding syndrome in malnourished older hospitalized patients

Pourhassan, Maryam, Cuvelier, Ingeborg, Gehrke, Ilse, Marburger, Christian, Modreker, Mirja Katrin, Volkert, Dorothee, Willschrei, Hans-Peter, Wirth, Rainer·2018·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background & aims Despite the high prevalence of malnutrition among older hospitalized persons, it is unknown how many of these malnourished patients are at risk of developing the refeeding syndrome (RFS). In this study, we sought to compare the prevalence and severity of malnutrition among older hospitalized patients with prevalence of known risk factors of RFS. Methods This cross-sectional multicenter-study investigated older participants who were consecutively admitted to the geriatric acute care ward. Malnutrition screening was conducted using Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF). The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) criteria were applied for assessing patients at risk of RFS. Weight and height were measured. Degree of weight loss (WL) was obtained by interview. Serum phosphate, magnesium, potassium, sodium, calcium, creatinine and urea were analyzed according to standard procedures. Results The study group comprised 342 participants (222 females) with a mean age of 83.1 ± 6.8 and BMI range of 14.7-43.6 kg/m 2 . More participants were assessed at risk of malnutrition using NRS-2002 (n = 253, 74.0%) compared to MUST (n = 170, 49.7%) and MNA-SF (n = 191, 55.8%). Of total participants, 239 (69.9%; 157 females) were considered to be at risk of RFS. Based on NRS-2002, 75.9% (n = 192) of patients at risk of malnutrition are at risk of RFS whereas accord…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.06.008

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A large overlap between the risk of malnutrition according to common screening tools and the risk of refeeding syndrome was observed in older hospitalized patients.

    “A large overlap between the risk of malnutrition according to common screening tools and the risk of RFS was observed in the same patient group ( 174”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pourhassan, M., Cuvelier, I., Gehrke, I., Marburger, C., Modreker, M. K., Volkert, D., Willschrei, H.-P., & Wirth, R.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinik Marien Hospital Herne (DE)
  • Sana Kliniken AG (DE)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Pourhassan, Maryam
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
1354-1359
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2621808070
Cited by
45
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
refeeding syndrome, malnutrition, hospitalized older adults, malnutrition screening, NRS-2002, Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form, weight loss, disease severity, body mass index, serum electrolytes, risk factors, nutritional rehabilitation, NICE criteria
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Geriatric Assessment, Nutrition Assessment, Malnutrition, Refeeding Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review