Cited by 136Dysphagia Assessment and ManagementVoice and Speech DisordersChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Systematic review and evidence based recommendations on texture modified foods and thickened liquids for adults (above 17 years) with oropharyngeal dysphagia – An updated clinical guideline

Beck, Anne Marie, Kjaersgaard, Annette, Hansen, Tina, Poulsen, Ingrid·2018·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background & aims Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) has significant consequences for both the person with dysphagia and the society. An often-used treatment for OD is the recommendation of the texture of food and liquids. This recommendation seems to be based more on best practice than on evidence from a systematic review of existing scientific evidence. The aim of this paper was to report the result of an up-date of an original national guideline focussing on whether thickened liquids (review question 1) and modified foods (review question 2) are beneficial for adults above 17 years with OD in relation to three critical outcomes (aspiration, pneumonia and death) and seven important outcomes (dehydration, weight loss, mealtime performance, patient preferences, intervention adherence and quality of life). Methods Three steps were used. First: An updated systematic literature search. Second: An assessment of the quality of the evidence for each review question by means of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Third: Development of clinical recommendations based on the evidence, assessment of the risk benefit ratio, and perceived patient preferences. Results The body of evidence consisted of two RCTs for review question 1 both using nectar thickened liquids or honey-thickened liquids. No evidence was found for two important outcomes, mealtime performance and quality of life. With regard to risk of pneumonia, death, aspiration, dehydrati…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.09.002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For persons with diabetic nephropathy, national and international guidelines recommend dietary advice tailored to the stage of kidney disease concerning potassium, phosphate, salt, and energy intake, ensuring malnutrition is prevented.

    “appropriate dietary advice tailored to the stage of kidney disease should be given concerning”

    From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [180]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beck, A. M., Kjaersgaard, A., Hansen, T., & Poulsen, I.
Affiliations
  • Metropolitan University College (DK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Beck, Anne Marie
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
1980-1991
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2753037067
Cited by
136
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
oropharyngeal dysphagia, texture-modified foods, thickened liquids, aspiration, pneumonia, dehydration, weight loss, patient preferences, intervention adherence, quality of life, adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Deglutition Disorders, Food, Formulated, Humans, Quality of Life, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Patient Preference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review