A systematic review and a dose-response meta-analysis of coffee dose and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Abstract
Objective Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most predominant chronic liver disease worldwide. Effect of coffee on NAFLD risk and its potential dose-response patterns were explored in the study.Design PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane and Embase were searched up to 10 April 2018. We performed pair-wise meta-analysis of <1 cup per day vs. 1-2 cups per days or >2 cups per day to pool the relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). And dose-response analysis was used to estimate relationship of NAFLD occurrence with coffee intake.Results Seven articles were included with 4825 cases and 49,616 non-cases. Compared with <1 cup, 1-2 cups or >2 cups of coffee consumption per day were not significantly associated with NAFLD occurrence, and RR were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.85-1.11) and 0.88 (95%CI: 0.72-1.06). However, the summary RR of the highest versus lowest coffee consumption was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92-0.97). Dose-response meta-analysis presented a non-linearity curve relationship of coffee and NAFLD occurrence while coffee consumption >3 cups per day reduced NAFLD significantly.Conclusion Coffee intake level more than 3 cups was observed lower risk of NAFLD than <2 cups per day. Although the risk of NAFLD was inversely associated with coffee consumption, while relevance may not be very close and more observational studies would be needed to verify the relationship of coffee and NAFLD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An earlier meta-analysis showed that intake of >-3 cups of coffee per day (vs. <2 per day) was related to reduced risk of MASLD.
“Similarly, an earlier meta-analysis showed that intake of > -3 cups of coffee per day ( vs . < 2 per day) was related to reduced risk of MASLD. 339”
From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [339]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 106
- Authors
- Chen, Y.-P., Lu, F.-B., Hu, Y.-B., Xu, L.-M., Zheng, M.-H., & Hu, E.-D.
- Affiliations
- First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (CN)
- Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province (CN)
- Wenzhou Medical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Hu, En-De
- Venue
- Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2552-2557
- ISSN
- 0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2902091323
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81570514, 81500477)
- Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LQ15H030006, LY15H030017)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
- Keywords
- coffee consumption, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, dose-response relationship, NAFLD risk, chronic liver disease
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Coffee, Diet, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Young Adult, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review