Cited by 106Coffee research and impactsLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

A systematic review and a dose-response meta-analysis of coffee dose and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Chen, Yong-Ping, Lu, Feng-Bin, Hu, Yi-Bing, Xu, Lan-Man, Zheng, Ming-Hua, Hu, En-De·2019·Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Objective Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most predominant chronic liver disease worldwide. Effect of coffee on NAFLD risk and its potential dose-response patterns were explored in the study.Design PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane and Embase were searched up to 10 April 2018. We performed pair-wise meta-analysis of <1 cup per day vs. 1-2 cups per days or >2 cups per day to pool the relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). And dose-response analysis was used to estimate relationship of NAFLD occurrence with coffee intake.Results Seven articles were included with 4825 cases and 49,616 non-cases. Compared with <1 cup, 1-2 cups or >2 cups of coffee consumption per day were not significantly associated with NAFLD occurrence, and RR were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.85-1.11) and 0.88 (95%CI: 0.72-1.06). However, the summary RR of the highest versus lowest coffee consumption was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92-0.97). Dose-response meta-analysis presented a non-linearity curve relationship of coffee and NAFLD occurrence while coffee consumption >3 cups per day reduced NAFLD significantly.Conclusion Coffee intake level more than 3 cups was observed lower risk of NAFLD than <2 cups per day. Although the risk of NAFLD was inversely associated with coffee consumption, while relevance may not be very close and more observational studies would be needed to verify the relationship of coffee and NAFLD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.11.030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 106

Authors
Chen, Y.-P., Lu, F.-B., Hu, Y.-B., Xu, L.-M., Zheng, M.-H., & Hu, E.-D.
Affiliations
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (CN)
  • Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province (CN)
  • Wenzhou Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Hu, En-De
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
2552-2557
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2902091323
Cited by
106
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81570514, 81500477)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LQ15H030006, LY15H030017)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
coffee consumption, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, dose-response relationship, NAFLD risk, chronic liver disease
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Coffee, Diet, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Young Adult, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review