CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 246Food Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsChild Nutrition and Water AccessFood Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impact of COVID-19 on diet quality, food security and nutrition in low and middle income countries: A systematic review of the evidence

Open access
Picchioni, Fiorella, Goulao, Luis F., Roberfroid, Dominique·2022·Clinical Nutrition
DOI 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.08.015PMC PMC8390094
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The current global pandemic of Coronavirus (COVID-19), and measures adopted to reduce its spread, threaten the nutritional status of populations in Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Documenting how the COVID-19 affects diets, nutrition and food security can help generating evidence-informed recommendations for mitigating interventions and policies. METHODS: We carried out a systematic literature review. A structured search strategy was applied in MEDLINE (Pubmed®), EMBASE®, Scopus® and Web of Science®. Grey literature was retrieved by screening a pre-set list of institutions involved in monitoring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nutrition and food security. The first search was done on 20th August 2020, and updated in mid-November 2020 and mid-January 2021. All research steps were described as recommended in the PRISMA statement. RESULTS: Out of the 2085 references identified, thirty-five primary studies were included. In spite of their heterogeneity, studies converge to demonstrate a detrimental effect of COVID-19 pandemic and associated containment measures on diet quality and food insecurity. One of the major direct effects of COVID-19 on food and nutrition outcomes has been through its impact on employment, income generating activities and associated purchasing power. Other channels of impact, such as physical access, availability and affordability of food provided a heterogeneous picture and were assessed via binary and often simplistic questions. The impacts of COVID-19 on food systems and diets manifested with various intensity degrees, duration and in different forms. Factors contributing to these variations between and within countries were: 1) timing, duration and stringency of national COVID-19 restriction measures and policies to mitigate their adverse impacts; 2) context specific food value chain responses to domestic and international containment measures; 3) differentiated impacts of restriction measures on different groups, along lines of gender, age, socio-economic status and employment conditions. Shorter value chains and traditional smallholder farms were somewhat more resilient in the face of COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, the impact of the pandemic has been particularly adverse on women, individuals with a low socio-economic status, informal workers and young adults that relied on daily wages. Finally, there were heterogeneous government responses to curb the virus and to mitigate the damaging effects of the pandemic. It has been demonstrated that existing and well-functioning social protection programmes and public distribution of food can buffer the adverse effects on food insecurity. But social safety nets cannot be effective on their own and there is a need for broader food systems interventions and investments to support sustainable and inclusive food systems to holistically achieve food and nutrition security. CONCLUSION: The current economic and heath crisis impacted diet quality and food security. This raises concerns about long term impacts on access to and affordability of nutrient-rich, healthy diets and their health implications. Women and individuals with a low socio-economic are likely to be the most at risk of food insecurity. Social safety nets can be effective to protect them and must be urgently implemented. We advocate for improved data collection to identify vulnerable groups and measure how interventions are successful in protecting them.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.08.015

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 39 references

5 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Turner, 2018, Vol. 18, 93
  2. 2020, Coronavirus food supply chain under strain: what to do? [Internet], Food Systems Transformation
  3. Prapti, 2020, COVID-19 challenges to equity: insights from rural Nepal and Senegal IFPRI: international food policy research institute, Agrilinks [Internet]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–246 of 246

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Picchioni, F., Goulao, L. F., & Roberfroid, D.
Affiliations
  • Natural Resources Institute (GB)
  • University of Namur (BE)
Corresponding author
Picchioni, Fiorella
ORCID
Venue
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
41
Issue
12
Pages
2955-2964
ISSN
0261-5614 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.clnu.2021.08.015
PMC
PMC8390094
OpenAlex
W3194928011
Cited by
245
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 51
FWCI
9.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of the University of Namur (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • European Commission (DCI/FOOD/2019/408-364)
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/AGR/04129/2020)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, diet quality, food security, nutrition, low- and middle-income countries, food systems, food value chains, smallholder farming, food affordability, food availability, food access, socioeconomic disparities, women's nutrition, social protection, government pandemic response, containment measures, nutrition policy, informal workers, young adults
MeSH terms
Food Security, COVID-19, Developing Countries, Diet, Female, Food Supply, Humans, Nutritional Status, Young Adult, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review