Water footprint for mining process: A proposed method to improve water management in mining operations
Open accessAbstract
The water footprint assessment for many products or processes has gained relevance; however, there are only a few aimed at the mining and metallurgy sector. The present study seeks to contribute a methodology to improve water footprint (WF) assessment in mining. The water footprint for the mining process (WFMP) method incorporates aspects that strengthen the Green WF (GreenWF), Blue WF (BWF) and Gray WF (GWF) quantification. The WFMP was applied in two study cases: 1) silver-gold heap leaching (SGHL) and 2) copper sulfide froth flotation (CSFF). The method proposed separating the main infrastructure and activities of the mine sites into modules, which can be assessed individually to obtain the water inventory by water type (green, blue or gray). The adaptation of this water classification in conjunction with a full flow set up module definition helps identifying the critical spots of the mining processes which enables taking actions aimed at minimizing water consumption and hence a better water management. A feature of mining processes is the vulnerability to the effect of the climate factors and the potential water gain/loss to process that can be monitored more precisely using daily data aimed to improve the use of water. The total WF for the SGHL process was 0.18 m3/t, where 0.13 m3/t corresponds to GreenWF and 0.04 m3/t to BWF. For the CSFF process, the WF was 0.26 m3/t, the GreenWF was 0.14 m3/t, and the BWF was 0.12 m3/t. Calculations of the GWF were not included as the processes studied were designed as zero liquid discharge. It was found that enabling changes in parameters that are dynamic contributes to obtain a more precise WF indicator.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The water footprint methodology has been extensively validated across diverse industrial sectors globally and provides a robust analytical framework to gauge water consumption.
“This methodology, extensively validated across diverse industrial sectors globally, provides a robust analytical framework to gauge water consumption in a more comprehensive way [11,29,30].”
From The water footprint of lithium extraction technologies: Insights from environmental impact reports in Argentina's salt flats (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
Cites
Transparency on greenhouse gas emissions from mining to enable climate change mitigation
Azadi, M., Northey, S. A., Ali, S. H., & Edraki, M. (2020) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-020-0531-3 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Díaz Paz, W. F., Seghezzo, L., Salas Barboza, A. G., Escosteguy, M., Arias-Alvarado, P. V., Kruse, E., Hufty, M., & Iribarnegaray, M. A. (2025) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42523 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“This methodology, extensively validated across diverse industrial sectors globally, provides a robust analytical framework to gauge water consumption in a more comprehensive way [11,29,30].”
- Authors
- Rodríguez, J. E., Razo, I., & Lázaro, I.
- Affiliations
- Autonomous University of San Luis Potosí (MX)
- Corresponding author
- Rodríguez, Jorge E.
- Venue
- Cleaner and Responsible Consumption
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 100094
- ISSN
- 2666-7843 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4311460162
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cleaner and Responsible Consumption (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí
- Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (297690)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Mine drainage and remediation techniques
- Keywords
- water footprint, mining, water management, green water footprint, blue water footprint, grey water footprint, heap leaching, froth flotation, copper sulfide, water classification, water inventory, zero liquid discharge, climate change vulnerability, water consumption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review