The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The EU proposal for a general data protection regulation and the roots of the “right to be forgotten”
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For instance, the condition of withdrawing consent in order the RtbF to be triggered has not been encompassed in any national or European data protection law so far [137].”
From Forgetting personal data and revoking consent under the GDPR: Challenges and proposed solutions (2018) · cites this paper as [137]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bourtoule, L., Chandrasekaran, V., Choquette-Choo, C. A., Jia, H., Travers, A., Zhang, B., Lie, D., & Papernot, N. (2021) · 2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp40001.2021.00019 · Cited by 810
“Recently introduced legislation, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union [5], the California Consumer Privacy Act [6] in the United States, and PIPEDA privacy legislation in Canada [7] include provisions that require the so-called right to be forgotten [8].”
BackgroundTikkinen-Piri, C., Rohunen, A., & Markkula, J. (2018) · Computer Law & Security Review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2017.05.015 · Cited by 460
Drachsler, H., & Greller, W. (2016) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/2883851.2883893 · Cited by 374
Predict and Surveil: Data, Discretion, and the Future of Policing
Brayne, S. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190684099.001.0001 · Cited by 334
Forgetting personal data and revoking consent under the GDPR: Challenges and proposed solutions
Politou, E., Alepis, E., & Patsakis, C. (2018) · Journal of Cybersecurity · doi:10.1093/cybsec/tyy001 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Mantelero, A.
- Affiliations
- Politecnico di Torino (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Mantelero, Alessandro
- Venue
- Computer Law & Security Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-235
- ISSN
- 2212-473X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004302204
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 126.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2013-10-01)
- Open access
- green
- porto.polito.it
- Licence
- Locations
- Computer law & security review (publishedVersion)
- PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Law › Freedom of Expression and Defamation
- Social Sciences › Law › Government, Law, and Information Management
- Keywords
- right to be forgotten, General Data Protection Regulation, Article 17 GDPR, data protection law, online information dissemination, judicial decisions, European Union law, United States law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
