Consumer neuro devices within EU product safety law: Are we prepared for big tech ante portas?
Open accessAbstract
Previously confined to the distinct medical market, neurotechnologies are expanding rapidly into the consumer market, driven by technological advancements and substantial investments. While offering promising benefits, concerns have emerged regarding the suitability of existing legal frameworks to adequately address the risks they present. Against the background of an ongoing global debate on new policies or new ‘neurorights’ regulating neurotechnology, this paper delves into the regulation of consumer Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) in the European Union (EU), focusing on the pertinent product safety legislation. The analysis will primarily examine the sector-specific product safety law for medical devices, the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR). It will meticulously delineate which consumer BCIs fall within its scope and are obliged to comply with the requirements outlined. The tech-based approach of Annex XVI MDR, coupled with recent amendments, show that the EU has adopted a forward-thinking rationale towards regulating health-related risks associated with consumer BCIs within existing EU medical devices legislation, while abstaining from over-regulating aspects therein that are beyond its core objectives. Supplementary, the paper will discuss developments in EU horizontal product safety law, regulating all consumer BCIs that are not subject to sector-specific product safety legislation. In their recently adopted General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR), the EU has introdu…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Guidance exists for medical BCIs (e.g., FDA, EU), but presently consumer BCIs lack the same kind of regulation.
“Guidance exists for medical BCIs (for example, in the USA FDA, and also in the EU—see [48]); but presently consumer BCIs lack the same kind of regulation, although some progress is being made (see Box 2) [19].”
From Ethical considerations for the use of brain–computer interfaces for cognitive enhancement (2024) · cites this paper as [48]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ethical considerations for the use of brain–computer interfaces for cognitive enhancement
Gordon, E. C., & Seth, A. K. (2024) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002899 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
- Authors
- Steindl, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Vienna (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Steindl, Elisabeth
- ORCID
- Steindl, Elisabeth
- Venue
- Computer Law & Security Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-04
- Volume
- 52
- Pages
- 105945
- ISSN
- 2212-473X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4391731308
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 30.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Computer law & security review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Law › European and International Contract Law
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
- Keywords
- neurotechnology regulation, product safety law, medical device regulation, digital products, neurorights, consumer protection, innovation and regulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review