Uso de las nuevas tecnologías por parte de los psicólogos españoles y sus necesidades
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this paper is to know the real situation in the use of information and communication technologies alongside the attitude of psychologists in Madrid Region. We conducted a quantitative research by means of a questionnaire based on previous literature reviews regarding the same topic in other countries. The sample consisted of all psychologists registered in the Spanish Psychology Association (COP), Madrid branch, with a total 486 responses. Only 26% use teletherapy along with other combined therapy modality involving face to face communication. Drawbacks in the study include primarily limitations of non-verbal communication and the therapeutic alliance, followed by confidentiality of data and technical problems with handling data.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent study in Spain shows that only 26% of the sample of psychologists analyzed used ICTs, and only 2.31% used web-based interventions.
“A recent study in Spain shows that only 26% of the sample of psychologists analyzed used ICTs, and only 2.31% of the sample used web-based interventions (28).”
From Exploring the relationship between the acceptability of an internet-based intervention for depression in primary care and clinical outcomes: Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial (2019) · cites this paper as [28]
In “Utilización de Internet en la práctica profesional” (page not available), the paper reports that 26.66% of surveyed health psychologists used videoconference therapy—not that only 26% used ICTs generally. Table 1 reports web-based interventions for 3.85% of teletherapy users (N = 130); 2.31% refers instead to videoconferencing through a mobile application. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 41
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Glueck, D. (2013). Establishing Therapeutic Rapport. En K. Myers y C. L. Turvey (Eds.), Telemental Health (pp. 29-46). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-416048-4.00003-8 · DOI
- etrds0049 · DOI
- Kennedy, T., Wellman, B. y Klement, K. (2003). Gendering the digital divide. IT & Society, 1(5), 72-96.
- Authors
- González-Peña, P., Torres, R., Barrio, V. D., & Olmedo, M.
- Venue
- Clínica y Salud
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 81-91
- ISSN
- 1130-5274 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2612809112
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Clínica y Salud (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
- Scientific Electronic library online (Sciences Carlos III Health Institute) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- information and communication technologies, psychologists, external beam radiotherapy, nonverbal communication, therapeutic relationship, confidentiality, technical challenges, Madrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
