The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive laws
Open accessAbstract
We propose a new approach for data-driven automated discovery of isotropic hyperelastic constitutive laws. The approach is unsupervised, i.e., it requires no stress data but only displacement and global force data, which are realistically available through mechanical testing and digital image correlation techniques; it delivers interpretable models, i.e., models that are embodied by parsimonious mathematical expressions discovered through sparse regression of a large catalogue of candidate functions; it is one-shot, i.e., discovery only needs one experiment — but can use more if available. The problem of unsupervised discovery is solved by enforcing equilibrium constraints in the bulk and at the loaded boundary of the domain. Sparsity of the solution is achieved by ℓp regularization combined with thresholding, which calls for a non-linear optimization scheme. The ensuing fully automated algorithm leverages physics-based constraints for the automatic determination of the penalty parameter in the regularization term. Using numerically generated data including artificial noise, we demonstrate the ability of the approach to accurately discover five hyperelastic models of different complexity. We also show that, if a “true” feature is missing in the function library, the proposed approach is able to surrogate it in such a way that the actual response is still accurately predicted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 · Cited by 20,384
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning
Cohen, W. W., McCallum, A., & Roweis, S. T. (2008) · Cited by 5,691
Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems
Brunton, S. L., Proctor, J. L., & Kutz, J. N. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1517384113 · Cited by 4,796
A three-dimensional constitutive model for the large stretch behavior of rubber elastic materials
Arruda, E. M., & Boyce, M. C. (1993) · Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids · doi:10.1016/0022-5096(93)90013-6 · Cited by 3,239
Sutton, M. A., Orteu, J., & Schreier, H. W. (2009) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-78747-3 · Cited by 3,182
Distilling Free-Form Natural Laws from Experimental Data
Schmidt, M., & Lipson, H. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165893 · Cited by 2,890
Convexity conditions and existence theorems in nonlinear elasticity
Ball, J. M. (1976) · Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis · doi:10.1007/bf00279992 · Cited by 2,436
Analysis of Composite Materials—A Survey
Hashin, Z. (1983) · Journal of Applied Mechanics · doi:10.1115/1.3167081 · Cited by 2,405
Metadata
- Authors
- Flaschel, M., Kumar, S., & De Lorenzis, L.
- Venue
- Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 381
- Pages
- 113852
- ISSN
- 0045-7825 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3157127629
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 9.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive laws. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cma.2021.113852
- The paper
- Flaschel, M., Kumar, S., & De Lorenzis, L. (2021). Unsupervised discovery of interpretable hyperelastic constitutive laws. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.113852
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.