Cited by 57Vector-borne infectious diseasesClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlHealthcare cost, quality, practices

Lyme disease overdiagnosis in a large healthcare system: a population-based, retrospective study

Open access
Webber, B.J., Burganowski, R.P., Colton, L., Escobar, J.D., Pathak, S.R., Gambino-Shirley, K.J.·2019·Clinical Microbiology and Infection

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the impact of false-positive IgM immunoblots on Lyme disease treatment and case reporting in a large healthcare system. Methods We obtained the results of all Lyme disease serological tests ordered at U.S. Air Force healthcare facilities in the USA between January 2013 and December 2017. We conducted chart reviews to adjudicate positive IgM immunoblots (from two-tier and independent testing) as true positives or false positives using established criteria, and we assessed whether these cases were reported to the U.S. Department of Defense surveillance system. Results Of the 18 410 serum tests (17 058 immunoassays and 1352 immunoblots) performed on 15 928 unique individuals, 249/1352 (18.4%) IgM immunoblots were positive. After excluding repeat tests, insufficiently documented cases, and participants with a history of Lyme disease, 212 positive IgM immunoblot cases were assessed. A total of 113/212 (53.3%) were determined to be false positives. Antibiotics were prescribed for Lyme disease for 97/99 (98.0%) participants with a true-positive test and 91/113 (80.5%) participants with a false-positive test. The number of false-positive cases reported to the surveillance system was identical to the number of unreported true-positive cases (n = 44). Conclusions Lyme disease serological tests were overused in a large healthcare system, and positive results were frequently misinterpreted, leading to misdiagnosis and widespread antibiotic misuse. Underreporting of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.02.020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are cases of incorrect reporting of Lyme disease in clinical practice, resulting in false-positive diagnoses, and incidence rates should be interpreted with caution.

    “It should be noted, however, there that are cases of incorrect reporting of Lyme disease in clinical practice, resulting in false-positive diagnoses of Lyme disease, and accordingly, incidence rates should be interpreted with caution [67].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Webber, B. J., Burganowski, R. P., Colton, L., Escobar, J. D., Pathak, S. R., & Gambino-Shirley, K. J.
Affiliations
  • Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (US)
  • Solutions Through Innovative Technologies (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Webber, B.J.
Venue
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
1233-1238
ISSN
1198-743X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2917833030
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Microbiology and Infection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
  • U.S. Air Force
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Keywords
Lyme disease, overdiagnosis, serological testing, antibiotic misuse, misdiagnosis, case notification, surveillance systems, United States Air Force, military health services
MeSH terms
Medical Overuse, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Bacterial, Child, Child, Preschool, False Positive Reactions, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin M, Infant, Lyme Disease, Male, Middle Aged, Military Personnel, Retrospective Studies, Serologic Tests, United States, Immunoblotting, Incidence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review