Cited by 1Cancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesHealth and Well-being Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Depression and quality of life in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: relation between the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cmonc.2012.03.007

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sheehan, 1995, Comparison of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) with the SCID-P and the CIC: A Validity Study, Psychopharm Bull, 31, 616

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Jang, S., Ackler, J., Braitman, L., & Tester, W.
Venue
Community Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
122-126
ISSN
1548-5315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2315791504
Cited by
1
References
27
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Community Oncology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
depression, quality of life, cancer patients, chemotherapy, Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale, cancer-related quality of life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review