The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Support Vectors Machine-based identification of heart valve diseases using heart sounds
Abstract
Taking into account that heart auscultation remains the dominant method for heart examination in the small health centers of the rural areas and generally in primary healthcare set-ups, the enhancement of this technique would aid significantly in the diagnosis of heart diseases. In this context, the present paper initially surveys the research that has been conducted concerning the exploitation of heart sound signals for automated and semi-automated detection of pathological heart conditions. Then it proposes an automated diagnosis system for the identification of heart valve diseases based on the Support Vector Machines (SVM) classification of heart sounds. This system performs a highly difficult diagnostic task (even for experienced physicians), much more difficult than the basic diagnosis of the existence or not of a heart valve disease (i.e. the classification of a heart sound as 'healthy' or 'having a heart valve disease'): it identifies the particular heart valve disease. The system was applied in a representative global dataset of 198 heart sound signals, which come both from healthy medical cases and from cases suffering from the four most usual heart valve diseases: aortic stenosis (AS), aortic regurgitation (AR), mitral stenosis (MS) and mitral regurgitation (MR). Initially the heart sounds were successfully categorized using a SVM classifier as normal or disease-related and then the corresponding murmurs in the unhealthy cases were classified as systolic or diastolic. For the heart sounds diagnosed as having systolic murmur we used a SVM classifier for performing a more detailed classification of them as having aortic stenosis or mitral regurgitation. Similarly for the heart sounds diagnosed as having diastolic murmur we used a SVM classifier for classifying them as having aortic regurgitation or mitral stenosis. Alternative classifiers have been applied to the same data for comparison (i.e. back-propagation neural networks, k-nearest-neighbour and naïve Bayes classifiers), however their performance for the same diagnostic problems was lower than the SVM classifiers proposed in this work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Cited by
An open access database for the evaluation of heart sound algorithms
Liu, C., Springer, D., Li, Q., Moody, B., Juan, R. A., Chorro, F. J., Castells, F., Roig, J. M., Silva, I., Johnson, A. E. W., et al. (2016) · Physiological Measurement · doi:10.1088/0967-3334/37/12/2181 · Cited by 820
Yu, W., Liu, T., Valdez, R., Gwinn, M., & Khoury, M. J. (2010) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-10-16 · Cited by 508
Arabasadi, Z., Alizadehsani, R., Roshanzamir, M., Moosaei, H., & Yarifard, A. A. (2017) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.01.004 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Maglogiannis, I., Loukis, E., Zafiropoulos, E., & Stasis, A.
- Venue
- Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-61
- ISSN
- 0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143755314
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Support Vectors Machine-based identification of heart valve diseases using heart sounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.01.003
- The paper
- Maglogiannis, I., Loukis, E., Zafiropoulos, E., & Stasis, A. (2009). Support Vectors Machine-based identification of heart valve diseases using heart sounds. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2009.01.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.