Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 325

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A SAS® macro implementation of a multiple comparison post hoc test for a Kruskal–Wallis analysis

Elliott, Alan C., Hynan, Linda S.·2011·Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.11.002

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Carmer, 1973, An evaluation of ten pairwise multiple comparison procedures by Monte Carlo methods, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68, 66, 10.2307/2284140 · doi:10.2307/2284140
  2. Dunn, 1964, Multiple contrasts using rank sums, Technometrics, 6, 241, 10.2307/1266041 · DOI
  3. Steele, 1961, Some rank sum multiple comparison tests, Biometrics, 17, 539, 10.2307/2527854 · DOI
  4. Van de Weil, 2002, Exact Distributions of Multiple Comparisons Rank Statistics, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97
  5. Voshaar, 1980, Oude, (k−1)-mean significance levels of nonparametric multiple comparisons procedures, The Annals of Statistics, 8, 75, 10.1214/aos/1176344892 · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344892

Cited by

See all 325

Metadata

Authors
Elliott, A. C., & Hynan, L. S.
Venue
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
102
Issue
1
Pages
75-80
ISSN
0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125063241
Cited by
325
References
0
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A SAS® macro implementation of a multiple comparison post hoc test for a Kruskal–Wallis analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.11.002
The paper
Elliott, A. C., & Hynan, L. S. (2011). A SAS® macro implementation of a multiple comparison post hoc test for a Kruskal–Wallis analysis. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.11.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.