Three novel approaches to structural identifiability analysis in mixed-effects models
Abstract
Background and objective Structural identifiability is a concept that considers whether the structure of a model together with a set of input-output relations uniquely determines the model parameters. In the mathematical modelling of biological systems, structural identifiability is an important concept since biological interpretations are typically made from the parameter estimates. For a system defined by ordinary differential equations, several methods have been developed to analyse whether the model is structurally identifiable or otherwise. Another well-used modelling framework, which is particularly useful when the experimental data are sparsely sampled and the population variance is of interest, is mixed-effects modelling. However, established identifiability analysis techniques for ordinary differential equations are not directly applicable to such models. Methods In this paper, we present and apply three different methods that can be used to study structural identifiability in mixed-effects models. The first method, called the repeated measurement approach, is based on applying a set of previously established statistical theorems. The second method, called the augmented system approach, is based on augmenting the mixed-effects model to an extended state-space form. The third method, called the Laplace transform mixed-effects extension, is based on considering the moment invariants of the systems transfer function as functions of random variables. Results To illustrate, compare and contrast the application of the three methods, they are applied to a set of mixed-effects models. Conclusions Three structural identifiability analysis methods applicable to mixed-effects models have been presented in this paper. As method development of structural identifiability techniques for mixed-effects models has been given very little attention, despite mixed-effects models being widely used, the methods presented in this paper provides a way of handling structural identifiability in mixed-effects models previously not possible.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Software packages for structural identifiability analysis have been developed in recent years and are generally widely available.
“During the past few years, software packages have been developed and are generally widely available that can ease the burden in performing such analysis.52, 53, 54, 55”
Cites
Nonlinear controllability and observability
Hermann, R., & Krener, A. (1977) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1977.1101601 · Cited by 2,374 · cited 3× · see citing works
“A system such as (1)–(2) is said to be observable if and only if, given an input–output map, the initial conditions x0 can be determined, see [22].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAddressing parameter identifiability by model-based experimentation
Raue, A., Kreutz, C., Maiwald, T., Klingmüller, U., & Timmer, J. (2011) · IET Systems Biology · doi:10.1049/iet-syb.2010.0061 · Cited by 145 · cited 2× · see citing works
“These methods include the Taylor series expansion introduced in [2], the Laplace transformation approach in [1], a differential algebra approach in [3], the software DAISY which is also based on differential algebra algorithms, presented in [4], the Exact Arithmetic Rank (EAR) approach in [5], rewriting the model in a…”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cucurull‐Sanchez, L., Chappell, M. J., Chelliah, V., Amy Cheung, S. Y., Derks, G., Penney, M., Phipps, A., Malik‐Sheriff, R. S., Timmis, J., Tindall, M. J., et al. (2019) · CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/psp4.12381 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
“…• Consider running a bifurcation analysis to define the scope of extrapolations from the model • Consider model reduction methods Walter et al. (1987)48 Janzen et al. (2016)53 Raue et al. (2014)55 Karlsson et al. (2012)56 Villaverde et al. (2019)57 Meshkat et al. (2014)58 Saccomani et al.…”
MethodSelf-citationParameter Identifiability of Fundamental Pharmacodynamic Models
Janzén, D. L. I., Bergenholm, L., Jirstrand, M., Parkinson, J., Yates, J., Evans, N. D., & Chappell, M. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2016.00590 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Janzén, D. L. I., Jirstrand, M., Chappell, M. J., & Evans, N. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Fraunhofer Chalmers Research Centre for Industrial Mathematics (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Janzén, David L.I.
- Venue
- Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 171
- Pages
- 141-152
- ISSN
- 0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2346812644
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
- Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Marie Curie FP7 People ITN European Industrial Doctorate (EID)
- Innovative Modelling for Pharmacological Advances through Collaborative Training (316736)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Keywords
- structural identifiability, mixed models, parameter identifiability, Laplace transform, ordinary differential equations, sparse sampling, population variance
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Models, Statistical, Biostatistics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review