Cited by 21Control Systems and IdentificationStatistical and numerical algorithmsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Three novel approaches to structural identifiability analysis in mixed-effects models

Janzén, David L.I., Jirstrand, Mats, Chappell, Michael J., Evans, Neil D.·2019·Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Abstract

Background and objective Structural identifiability is a concept that considers whether the structure of a model together with a set of input-output relations uniquely determines the model parameters. In the mathematical modelling of biological systems, structural identifiability is an important concept since biological interpretations are typically made from the parameter estimates. For a system defined by ordinary differential equations, several methods have been developed to analyse whether the model is structurally identifiable or otherwise. Another well-used modelling framework, which is particularly useful when the experimental data are sparsely sampled and the population variance is of interest, is mixed-effects modelling. However, established identifiability analysis techniques for ordinary differential equations are not directly applicable to such models. Methods In this paper, we present and apply three different methods that can be used to study structural identifiability in mixed-effects models. The first method, called the repeated measurement approach, is based on applying a set of previously established statistical theorems. The second method, called the augmented system approach, is based on augmenting the mixed-effects model to an extended state-space form. The third method, called the Laplace transform mixed-effects extension, is based on considering the moment invariants of the systems transfer function as functions of random variables. Results To illustrate, compare and contrast the application of the three methods, they are applied to a set of mixed-effects models. Conclusions Three structural identifiability analysis methods applicable to mixed-effects models have been presented in this paper. As method development of structural identifiability techniques for mixed-effects models has been given very little attention, despite mixed-effects models being widely used, the methods presented in this paper provides a way of handling structural identifiability in mixed-effects models previously not possible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.04.024

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janzén, D. L. I., Jirstrand, M., Chappell, M. J., & Evans, N. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • Fraunhofer Chalmers Research Centre for Industrial Mathematics (SE)
Corresponding author
Janzén, David L.I.
Venue
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
171
Pages
141-152
ISSN
0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2346812644
Cited by
21
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Marie Curie FP7 People ITN European Industrial Doctorate (EID)
  • Innovative Modelling for Pharmacological Advances through Collaborative Training (316736)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
structural identifiability, mixed models, parameter identifiability, Laplace transform, ordinary differential equations, sparse sampling, population variance
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Computer Simulation, Models, Statistical, Biostatistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review