MotorBrain: A mobile app for the assessment of users’ motor performance in neurology
Open accessAbstract
Background and objective Human motor skills or impairments have been traditionally assessed by neurologists by means of paper-and-pencil tests or special hardware. More recently, technologies such as digitizing tablets and touchscreens have offered neurologists new assessment possibilities, but their use has been restricted to a specific medical condition, or to stylus-operated mobile devices. The objective of this paper is twofold. First, we propose a mobile app (MotorBrain) that offers six computerized versions of traditional motor tests, can be used directly by patients (with and without the supervision of a clinician), and aims at turning millions of smartphones and tablets available to the general public into data collection and assessment tools. Then, we carry out a study to determine whether the data collected by MotorBrain can be meaningful for describing aging in human motor performance. Methods A sample of healthy participants (N= 133) carried out the motor tests using MotorBrain on a smartphone. Participants were split into two groups (Young, Old) based on their age (less than or equal to 30 years, greater than or equal to 50 years, respectively). The data collected by the app characterizes accuracy, reaction times, and speed of movement. It was analyzed to investigate differences between the two groups. Results The app does allow measuring differences in neuromotor performance. Data collected by the app allowed us to assess performance differences due to the aging of the neuromuscular system. Conclusions Data collected through MotorBrain is suitable to make meaningful distinctions among different kinds of performance, and allowed us to highlight performance differences associated to aging. MotorBrain supports the building of a large database of neuromotor data, which can be used for normative purposes in clinical use.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the literature, older adults are defined from ages 50 and above, 55 and above, and 70 and above.
“In the literature too, older adults are defned from ages 50 and above [15,61,66], 55 and above [2,67] and 70 and above [59,60].”
From "Where is history": Toward Designing a Voice Assistant to help Older Adults locate Interface Features quickly (2023) · cites this paper as [61]
Cites
Computerized measures of finger tapping: effects of hand dominance, age, and sex.
Hubel, K. A., Reed, B., Yund, E. W., Herron, T. J., & Woods, D. L. (2013) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/25.29.pms.116.3.929-952 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teleneurology and mobile technologies: the future of neurological care
Dorsey, E. R., Glidden, A. M., Holloway, M. R., Birbeck, G. L., & Schwamm, L. H. (2018) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2018.31 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Yu, J. E., Parde, N., & Chattopadhyay, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581447 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vianello, A., Chittaro, L., Burigat, S., & Budai, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Udine (IT)
- Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Vianello, Andrea
- Chittaro, Luca
- Venue
- Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 143
- Pages
- 35-47
- ISSN
- 0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2591560615
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- mobile application, motor performance assessment, smartphone-based assessment, aging, neuromuscular system, reaction time, movement speed, reference values
- MeSH terms
- Smartphone, Adult, Aging, Computer Graphics, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Skills, Neurology, Software, User-Computer Interface, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual, Computers, Handheld, Cell Phone, Mobile Applications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review