The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supervised learning based multimodal MRI brain tumour segmentation using texture features from supervoxels
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND Accurate segmentation of brain tumour in magnetic resonance images (MRI) is a difficult task due to various tumour types. Using information and features from multimodal MRI including structural MRI and isotropic (p) and anisotropic (q) components derived from the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) may result in a more accurate analysis of brain images. METHODS We propose a novel 3D supervoxel based learning method for segmentation of tumour in multimodal MRI brain images (conventional MRI and DTI). Supervoxels are generated using the information across the multimodal MRI dataset. For each supervoxel, a variety of features including histograms of texton descriptor, calculated using a set of Gabor filters with different sizes and orientations, and first order intensity statistical features are extracted. Those features are fed into a random forests (RF) classifier to classify each supervoxel into tumour core, oedema or healthy brain tissue. RESULTS The method is evaluated on two datasets: 1) Our clinical dataset: 11 multimodal images of patients and 2) BRATS 2013 clinical dataset: 30 multimodal images. For our clinical dataset, the average detection sensitivity of tumour (including tumour core and oedema) using multimodal MRI is 86% with balanced error rate (BER) 7%; while the Dice score for automatic tumour segmentation against ground truth is 0.84. The corresponding results of the BRATS 2013 dataset are 96%, 2% and 0.89, respectively. CONCLUSION The method demonstrates promising results in the segmentation of brain tumour. Adding features from multimodal MRI images can largely increase the segmentation accuracy. The method provides a close match to expert delineation across all tumour grades, leading to a faster and more reproducible method of brain tumour detection and delineation to aid patient management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficient multi-scale 3D CNN with fully connected CRF for accurate brain lesion segmentation
Kamnitsas, K., Ledig, C., Newcombe, V. F. J., Simpson, J. P., Kane, A. D., Menon, D. K., Rueckert, D., & Glocker, B. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.10.004 · Cited by 3,498 · cited 1×
“To overcome the computational burden of processing 3D medical scans, a dual pathway, 11-layers deep, three-dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) was presented in [44].”
MethodBrain tumor segmentation with Deep Neural Networks
Havaei, M., Davy, A., Warde-Farley, D., Biard, A., Courville, A., Bengio, Y., Pal, C., Jodoin, P.-M., & Larochelle, H. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.05.004 · Cited by 3,278
A survey of MRI-based medical image analysis for brain tumor studies
Bauer, S., Wiest, R., Nolte, L.-P., & Reyes, M. (2013) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/58/13/r97 · Cited by 1,036
State of the art survey on MRI brain tumor segmentation
Gordillo, N., Montseny, E., & Sobrevilla, P. (2013) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2013.05.002 · Cited by 697
Decision Forests for Tissue-Specific Segmentation of High-Grade Gliomas in Multi-channel MR
Zikic, D., Glocker, B., Konukoglu, E., Criminisi, A., Demiralp, C., Shotton, J., Thomas, O. M., Das, T., Jena, R., & Price, S. J. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33454-2_46 · Cited by 276
Brain Tumour Segmentation based on Extremely Randomized Forest with high-level features
Pinto, A., Pereira, S., Correia, H., Oliveira, J., Rasteiro, D. M. L. D., & Silva, C. A. (2015) · 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2015.7319032 · Cited by 108
DALSA: domain adaptation for supervised learning from sparsely annotated MR images
Goetz, M., Weber, C., Binczyk, F., Polanska, J., Tarnawski, R., Bobek-Billewicz, B., Koethe, U., Kleesiek, J., Stieltjes, B., & Maier-Hein, K. H. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2015.2463078 · Cited by 98
Cited by
Brain tumor detection and classification using machine learning: a comprehensive survey
Amin, J., Sharif, M., Haldorai, A., Yasmin, M., & Nayak, R. S. (2022) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-021-00563-y · Cited by 503
Siva Raja, P. M., & rani, A. V. (2020) · Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.bbe.2020.01.006 · Cited by 253
Papadimitroulas, P., Brocki, L., Christopher Chung, N., Marchadour, W., Vermet, F., Gaubert, L., Eleftheriadis, V., Plachouris, D., Visvikis, D., Kagadis, G. C., et al. (2021) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.03.009 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Soltaninejad, M., Yang, G., Lambrou, T., Allinson, N., Jones, T. L., Barrick, T. R., Howe, F. A., & Ye, X.
- Venue
- Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 157
- Pages
- 69-84
- ISSN
- 0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2782833026
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 7.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supervised learning based multimodal MRI brain tumour segmentation using texture features from supervoxels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.01.003
- The paper
- Soltaninejad, M., Yang, G., Lambrou, T., Allinson, N., Jones, T. L., Barrick, T. R., Howe, F. A., & Ye, X. (2018). Supervised learning based multimodal MRI brain tumour segmentation using texture features from supervoxels. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.01.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.