Cited by 158Machine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareElectronic Health Records Systems

Predicting the onset of type 2 diabetes using wide and deep learning with electronic health records

Nguyen, Binh P., Pham, Hung N., Tran, Hop, Nghiem, Nhung, Nguyen, Quang H., Do, Trang T.T., Tran, Cao Truong, Simpson, Colin R.·2019·Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Abstract

Objective Diabetes is responsible for considerable morbidity, healthcare utilisation and mortality in both developed and developing countries. Currently, methods of treating diabetes are inadequate and costly so prevention becomes an important step in reducing the burden of diabetes and its complications. Electronic health records (EHRs) for each individual or a population have become important tools in understanding developing trends of diseases. Using EHRs to predict the onset of diabetes could improve the quality and efficiency of medical care. In this paper, we apply a wide and deep learning model that combines the strength of a generalised linear model with various features and a deep feed-forward neural network to improve the prediction of the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Materials and methods The proposed method was implemented by training various models into a logistic loss function using a stochastic gradient descent. We applied this model using public hospital record data provided by the Practice Fusion EHRs for the United States population. The dataset consists of de-identified electronic health records for 9948 patients, of which 1904 have been diagnosed with T2DM. Prediction of diabetes in 2012 was based on data obtained from previous years (2009-2011). The imbalance class of the model was handled by Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) for each cross-validation training fold to analyse the performance when synthetic examples for the min…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105055

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, B. P., Pham, H. N., Tran, H., Nghiem, N., Nguyen, Q. H., Do, T. T. T., Tran, C. T., & Simpson, C. R.
Affiliations
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
  • Trường Đại học Khoa học và Công nghệ Hà Nội (VN)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
  • Le Quy Don Technical University (VN)
Corresponding author
Nguyen, Binh P.
Venue
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
182
Pages
105055
ISSN
0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971123115
Cited by
158
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17
FWCI
8.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Nvidia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, diabetes onset prediction, electronic health records, synthetic minority oversampling, class imbalance, hospital records, diabetes prevention, ensemble learning, generalized linear models, feedforward neural networks, sensitivity and specificity trade-off
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review