Predicting the onset of type 2 diabetes using wide and deep learning with electronic health records
Abstract
Objective Diabetes is responsible for considerable morbidity, healthcare utilisation and mortality in both developed and developing countries. Currently, methods of treating diabetes are inadequate and costly so prevention becomes an important step in reducing the burden of diabetes and its complications. Electronic health records (EHRs) for each individual or a population have become important tools in understanding developing trends of diseases. Using EHRs to predict the onset of diabetes could improve the quality and efficiency of medical care. In this paper, we apply a wide and deep learning model that combines the strength of a generalised linear model with various features and a deep feed-forward neural network to improve the prediction of the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Materials and methods The proposed method was implemented by training various models into a logistic loss function using a stochastic gradient descent. We applied this model using public hospital record data provided by the Practice Fusion EHRs for the United States population. The dataset consists of de-identified electronic health records for 9948 patients, of which 1904 have been diagnosed with T2DM. Prediction of diabetes in 2012 was based on data obtained from previous years (2009-2011). The imbalance class of the model was handled by Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) for each cross-validation training fold to analyse the performance when synthetic examples for the min…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI algorithms can predict the onset of type 2 diabetes and its complications with remarkable accuracy.
“Various studies have shown that AI algorithms can predict the onset of T2D and its complications with remarkable accuracy (13-15).”
From Generative artificial intelligence in predictive analysis of diabetes and its complications: a narrative review (2025) · cites this paper as [15]
Cites
Miotto, R., Li, L., Kidd, B. A., & Dudley, J. T. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep26094 · Cited by 1,710 · see citing works
Benchmarking deep learning models on large healthcare datasets
Purushotham, S., Meng, C., Che, Z., & Liu, Y. (2018) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2018.04.007 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Machine learning in healthcare
Habehh, H., & Gohel, S. (2021) · Current Genomics · doi:10.2174/1389202922666210705124359 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Osonuga, A., Olawade, D. B., Gore, M., Rotifa, O. B., Egbon, E., Chinwah, V., & Boussios, S. (2025) · Annals of Translational Medicine · doi:10.21037/atm-25-62 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nguyen, B. P., Pham, H. N., Tran, H., Nghiem, N., Nguyen, Q. H., Do, T. T. T., Tran, C. T., & Simpson, C. R.
- Affiliations
- Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
- Trường Đại học Khoa học và Công nghệ Hà Nội (VN)
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
- Le Quy Don Technical University (VN)
- Corresponding author
- Nguyen, Binh P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 182
- Pages
- 105055
- ISSN
- 0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2971123115
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Nvidia
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, diabetes onset prediction, electronic health records, synthetic minority oversampling, class imbalance, hospital records, diabetes prevention, ensemble learning, generalized linear models, feedforward neural networks, sensitivity and specificity trade-off
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review