EEG-Based Seizure detection using linear graph convolution network with focal loss
Abstract
Background and objectives Epilepsy is a clinical phenomenon caused by sudden abnormal and excessive discharge of brain neurons. It affects around 70 million people all over the world. Seizure detection from Electroencephalography (EEG) has achieved rapid development. However, existing methods often extract features from single channel EEG while ignoring the spatial relationship between different EEG channels. To fill this gap, a novel seizure detection model based on linear graph convolution network (LGCN) was proposed to enhance the feature embedding of raw EEG signals during seizure and non-seizure periods. Method Pearson correlation matrix of raw EEG signals was calculated to build the input graph of the graph neural network where the coefficients of the matrix models the spatial relations in EEG signals. The last softmax layer makes the final decision (seizure vs. non-seizure). In addition, focal loss was utilized to redefine the loss function of LGCN to deal with the data imbalance problem during seizure detection. Results Experiments are conducted on the CHB-MIT dataset. The seizure detection accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, F1 and Auc are 99.30%, 98.82%, 99.43%, 98.73% and 98.57% respectively. Conclusions The proposed approach yields superior performance over the-state-of-the-art in seizure detection tasks on the CHB-MIT dataset. Our method works in an end-to-end manner and it does not need manually designed features. The ability to deal with imbalanced data is also attractive in real seizure detection scenarios where the duration of seizures is much shorter than the lasting time of non-seizure events.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Traditional statistical functional correlation measures (Pearson correlation, Tanh nonlinearity, average correlation coefficients, and covariance) cannot fully represent complex brain connectivity.
“Traditional statistical functional correlation measures include Pearson correlation (PC) (Chen et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2021), Tanh nonlinearity (Li, Liu, et al., 2021), average correlation coefficients (Zeng et al., 2020), and covariance (Zhang et al., 2021), which cannot fully represent the complex brain connectivity.”
From <scp>Spatial–temporal</scp> graph convolutional network for Alzheimer classification based on brain functional connectivity imaging of electroencephalogram (2022) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2021
In recent 2 years, GCNs have been applied in the diagnoses of various brain disorders, such as children's ASD evaluation, detection of epileptic, seizure prediction, and epilepsy classification.
“In recent 2 years, GCNs have been applied in the diagnoses of various brain disorders, such as children's ASD evaluation (Zhang et al., 2021), detection of epileptic (Zeng et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2021), seizure prediction (Li, Liu, et al., 2021), and epilepsy classification (Chen et al., 2020).”
From <scp>Spatial–temporal</scp> graph convolutional network for Alzheimer classification based on brain functional connectivity imaging of electroencephalogram (2022) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2021
The adjacency matrix is constructed by Pearson correlation analysis and five functional connectivities of the mini-epoch EEG channels without any preset threshold to avoid potential risk caused by manual selection.
“The adjacency matrix is constructed by Pearson correlation analysis and five functional connectivities of the mini‐epoch EEG channels without any preset threshold to avoid the potential risk caused by manual selection, such as in Chen et al. (2020), Zhang et al. (2021), and Zhao et al. (2021).”
From <scp>Spatial–temporal</scp> graph convolutional network for Alzheimer classification based on brain functional connectivity imaging of electroencephalogram (2022) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2021
Cites
Seizure detection, seizure prediction, and closed-loop warning systems in epilepsy
Ramgopal, S., Thome-Souza, S., Jackson, M., Kadish, N. E., Sánchez Fernández, I., Klehm, J., Bosl, W., Reinsberger, C., Schachter, S., & Loddenkemper, T. (2014) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.06.023 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
Zeng, D., Huang, K., Xu, C., Shen, H., & Chen, Z. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · doi:10.1109/tcds.2020.3012278 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shan, X., Cao, J., Huo, S., Chen, L., Sarrigiannis, P. G., & Zhao, Y. (2022) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.25994 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“Traditional statistical functional correlation measures include Pearson correlation (PC) (Chen et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2021), Tanh nonlinearity (Li, Liu, et al., 2021), average correlation coefficients (Zeng et al., 2020), and covariance (Zhang et al., 2021), which cannot fully represent the…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationAn improved EEGNet for single-trial EEG classification in rapid serial visual presentation task
Zhang, H., Wang, Z., Yu, Y., Yin, H., Chen, C., & Wang, H. (2022) · Brain Science Advances · doi:10.26599/bsa.2022.9050007 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“For the problem of unbalanced samples, the focal loss function can reduce the weight of non-target samples to make the model focus more on the classification of target samples during training [33].”
Background
- Authors
- Zhao, Y., Dong, C., Zhang, G., Wang, Y., Chen, X., Jia, W., Yuan, Q., Xu, F., & Zheng, Y.
- Affiliations
- Shandong Normal University (CN)
- Qilu University of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhao, Yanna
- Venue
- Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-09
- Volume
- 208
- Pages
- 106277
- ISSN
- 0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3180490839
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18
- FWCI
- 8.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
- Keywords
- seizure detection, EEG, focal loss, epilepsy, Pearson correlation matrix, graph neural networks, class imbalance, CHB-MIT dataset, raw EEG data, end-to-end classification
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Humans, Seizures, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review