Cited by 105EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEmotion and Mood RecognitionEpilepsy research and treatment

EEG-Based Seizure detection using linear graph convolution network with focal loss

Zhao, Yanna, Dong, Changxu, Zhang, Gaobo, Wang, Yaru, Chen, Xin, Jia, Weikuan, Yuan, Qi, Xu, Fangzhou +1 more·2021·Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Abstract

Background and objectives Epilepsy is a clinical phenomenon caused by sudden abnormal and excessive discharge of brain neurons. It affects around 70 million people all over the world. Seizure detection from Electroencephalography (EEG) has achieved rapid development. However, existing methods often extract features from single channel EEG while ignoring the spatial relationship between different EEG channels. To fill this gap, a novel seizure detection model based on linear graph convolution network (LGCN) was proposed to enhance the feature embedding of raw EEG signals during seizure and non-seizure periods. Method Pearson correlation matrix of raw EEG signals was calculated to build the input graph of the graph neural network where the coefficients of the matrix models the spatial relations in EEG signals. The last softmax layer makes the final decision (seizure vs. non-seizure). In addition, focal loss was utilized to redefine the loss function of LGCN to deal with the data imbalance problem during seizure detection. Results Experiments are conducted on the CHB-MIT dataset. The seizure detection accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, F1 and Auc are 99.30%, 98.82%, 99.43%, 98.73% and 98.57% respectively. Conclusions The proposed approach yields superior performance over the-state-of-the-art in seizure detection tasks on the CHB-MIT dataset. Our method works in an end-to-end manner and it does not need manually designed features. The ability to deal with imbalanced data is also attractive in real seizure detection scenarios where the duration of seizures is much shorter than the lasting time of non-seizure events.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106277

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, Y., Dong, C., Zhang, G., Wang, Y., Chen, X., Jia, W., Yuan, Q., Xu, F., & Zheng, Y.
Affiliations
  • Shandong Normal University (CN)
  • Qilu University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Yanna
Venue
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
208
Pages
106277
ISSN
0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3180490839
Cited by
105
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18
FWCI
8.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
Keywords
seizure detection, EEG, focal loss, epilepsy, Pearson correlation matrix, graph neural networks, class imbalance, CHB-MIT dataset, raw EEG data, end-to-end classification
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Humans, Seizures, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review