Lightweight deep neural networks for cholelithiasis and cholecystitis detection by point-of-care ultrasound
Abstract
Background and objective Emergency physicians (EPs) frequently deal with abdominal pain, including that is caused by either gallstones or acute cholecystitis. Easy access and low cost justify point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use as a first-line test to detect these diseases; yet, the detection performance of POCUS by EPs is unreliable, causing misdiagnoses with serious impacts. This study aimed to develop a machine learning system to detect and localize gallstones and to detect acute cholecystitis by ultrasound (US) still images taken by physicians or technicians for preliminary diagnoses. Methods Abdominal US images (> 89,000) were collected from 2386 patients in a hospital database. We constructed training sets for gallstones with or without cholecystitis (N = 10,971) and cholecystitis with or without gallstones (N = 7348) as positives. Validation sets were also constructed for gallstones (N = 2664) and cholecystitis (N = 1919). We applied a single-shot multibox detector (SSD) and a feature pyramid network (FPN) to classify and localize objects using image features extracted by ResNet-50 for gallstones, and MobileNet V2 to classify cholecystitis. The deep learning models were pretrained using the COCO-2017 and ILSVRC-2012 datasets. Results Using the validation sets, the SSD-FPN-ResNet-50 and MobileNet V2 achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.92 and 0.94, respectively. The inference speeds were 21 (47.6 frames per second, fps) and 7 ms (142.9 fps). Conclusions A machine learning system was developed to detect and localize gallstones, and to detect cholecystitis, with acceptable discrimination and speed. This is the first study to develop this system for either gallstone or cholecystitis detection with absence or presence of each one. After clinical trials, this system may be used to assist EPs, including those in remote areas, for detecting these diseases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
YOLOv3 has demonstrated high accuracy (92.7%) in detecting and classifying gallstones in CT scans, making it a valuable tool in radiology for diagnosing gallbladder diseases quickly and accurately.
“YOLOv3 has demonstrated high accuracy (92.7%) in detecting and classifying gallstones in CT scans, making it a valuable tool in radiology for diagnosing gallbladder diseases quickly and accurately [54].”
From The YOLO Framework: A Comprehensive Review of Evolution, Applications, and Benchmarks in Object Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [54]
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., & Belongie, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.106 · Cited by 30,939 · see citing works
Antropova, N., Huynh, B. Q., & Giger, M. L. (2017) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.12453 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Application of artificial intelligence in gastroenterology
Yang, Y. J., & Bang, C. S. (2019) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v25.i14.1666 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ali, M. L., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers13120336 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yu, C.-J., Yeh, H.-J., Chang, C.-C., Tang, J.-H., Kao, W.-Y., Chen, W.-C., Huang, Y.-J., Li, C.-H., Chang, W.-H., Lin, Y.-T., Sufriyana, H., & Su, E. C.-Y.
- Affiliations
- Taipei Medical University Hospital (TW)
- Acer (Taiwan) (TW)
- Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surabaya (ID)
- Corresponding author
- Chang, Chun-Chao
- Su, Emily Chia-Yu
- ORCID
- Venue
- Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 211
- Pages
- 106382
- ISSN
- 0169-2607 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3197029710
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education (DP2-110-21121-01-A-13)
- Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST109-2221-E-038-018, MOST110-2628-E-038-001)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- gallstones, cholecystitis, point-of-care ultrasound, gallstone detection, Single Shot MultiBox Detector, feature pyramid network, MobileNetV2, ResNet50, lightweight neural networks, emergency medicine, abdominal pain, computer-aided diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Cholecystitis, Humans, Ultrasonography, Neural Networks, Computer, Point-of-Care Systems, Gallstones
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review