Cited by 224Primate Behavior and EcologyCognitive Abilities and TestingMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Numbers of neurons as biological correlates of cognitive capability

Herculano-Houzel, Suzana·2017·Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.02.004

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Comparing distantly related taxa on their cognitive performance based on brain measures only is not advised given known differences in neuron densities in different clades and the effect on brain size of highly divergent bauplans.

    “It might be objected that comparing distantly related taxa on their cognitive performance based on brain measures only is not advised given the known differences in neuron densities in the brains of different clades [Herculano-Houzel, 2017] and the effect on brain size of highly divergent bauplans.We fully endorse this view.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herculano-Houzel, S.
Venue
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
16
Pages
1-7
ISSN
2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2590482652
Cited by
224
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion)
Funders
James McDonnell Foundation (220020232)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
neuron number, brain size, cognitive ability, cerebral cortex, pallium, brainstem, body mass, cross-species comparison, cell counting, avian cognition, primate cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review