The role of attention bias to threat in anxiety: mechanisms, modulators and open questions
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anxiety is linked with dysfunctional interactions among multiple brain regions, including the salience network and executive control network.
“Such research links anxiety with dysfunctional interactions among multiple brain regions, including the salience network (supporting automatic threat evaluation/detection, and spanning amygdala/insula/frontal regions) and executive control network (supporting goal-directed activity, and spanning frontal/parietal regions) [110-115].”
From Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention: Cognitive-Motivational Framework and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [111]
The executive control network supports goal-directed activity and spans frontal/parietal regions.
“Such research links anxiety with dysfunctional interactions among multiple brain regions, including the salience network (supporting automatic threat evaluation/detection, and spanning amygdala/insula/frontal regions) and executive control network (supporting goal-directed activity, and spanning frontal/parietal regions) [110-115].”
From Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention: Cognitive-Motivational Framework and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [111]
The salience network supports automatic threat evaluation/detection and spans amygdala/insula/frontal regions.
“Such research links anxiety with dysfunctional interactions among multiple brain regions, including the salience network (supporting automatic threat evaluation/detection, and spanning amygdala/insula/frontal regions) and executive control network (supporting goal-directed activity, and spanning frontal/parietal regions) [110-115].”
From Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention: Cognitive-Motivational Framework and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [111]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 58
- Authors
- Okon-Singer, H.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 19
- Pages
- 26-30
- ISSN
- 2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2761690224
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 1.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- attention bias to threat, anxiety, threat avoidance, attentional bias modification, neuronal connectivity, anxiety treatment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
