The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resource-rational decision making
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Elements of Information Theory
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471200611 · Cited by 37,139
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6114 · Cited by 20,067
(2011) · Cited by 14,317
Elements of Information Theory
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2005) · doi:10.1002/047174882x · Cited by 13,791
Rational choice and the structure of the environment.
Simon, H. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0042769 · Cited by 5,919
Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics
Kahneman, D. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803322655392 · Cited by 5,377
Implications of rational inattention
Sims, C. (2003) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/s0304-3932(03)00029-1 · Cited by 3,582
Some informational aspects of visual perception.
Attneave, F. (1954) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0054663 · Cited by 2,938
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Webb, 2020, The normalization of consumer valuations: context-dependent preferences from neurobiological constraints, Manag Sci
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The whole prefrontal cortex is premotor cortex
Fine, J. M., & Hayden, B. Y. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0524 · Cited by 151
Contextual inference in learning and memory
Heald, J. B., Lengyel, M., & Wolpert, D. M. (2022) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2022.10.004 · Cited by 120
Time pressure changes how people explore and respond to uncertainty
Wu, C. M., Schulz, E., Pleskac, T. J., & Speekenbrink, M. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07901-1 · Cited by 103
A brief history of heuristics: how did research on heuristics evolve?
Hjeij, M., & Vilks, A. (2023) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-01542-z · Cited by 105
Developmental changes in exploration resemble stochastic optimization
Giron, A. P., Ciranka, S., Schulz, E., van den Bos, W., Ruggeri, A., Meder, B., & Wu, C. M. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01662-1 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhui, R., Lai, L., & Gershman, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gershman, Samuel J
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-10
- Volume
- 41
- Pages
- 15-21
- ISSN
- 2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3146051674
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 95
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 11
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
- Keywords
- reference dependence, stochastic choice, perseveration, rationality and irrationality, decision bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
