Media formulation optimization: current and future opportunities
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fully defined formulations remain challenging to implement for many systems.
“However, fully defined formulations remain challenging to implement for many systems (Galbraith et al., 2018; Ritacco et al., 2018; van der Valk et al., 2018).”
From Challenges and solutions in transitioning to animal-free standards: a comprehensive analysis of components in human cell-based developmental neurotoxicity assays (2026) · cites this paper as Galbraith et al., 2018
The integration of animal-free alternatives typically requires careful validation, including protocol adaptation, optimization of reagent concentrations, and confirmation of performance equivalence.
“Their integration, however, typically requires careful validation, including (Fritsche et al., 2017; Bal-Price et al., 2018a; Galbraith et al., 2018; Ritacco et al., 2018; van der Valk et al., 2018; Perez-Diaz et al., 2023; Pfeifer et al., 2024; Smirnova et al., 2024) protocol adaption, optimization of reagent concentrations, and confirmation of performance equivalence.”
From Challenges and solutions in transitioning to animal-free standards: a comprehensive analysis of components in human cell-based developmental neurotoxicity assays (2026) · cites this paper as Galbraith et al., 2018
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Graham, R. J., Bhatia, H., & Yoon, S. (2019) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.27140 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationSpänle, J. V., Haiber, L. M., & Seeger, B. (2026) · Frontiers in Toxicology · doi:10.3389/ftox.2026.1800157 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Galbraith, S. C., Bhatia, H., Liu, H., & Yoon, S.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 22
- Pages
- 42-47
- ISSN
- 2211-3398
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- NSF/IUCRC AMBIC (1624718)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
