Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 325

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Protein–polysaccharide interactions and aggregates in food formulations

Open access
Gentile, Luigi·2020·Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science

Abstract

Abstract The protein–polysaccharide combinations that lead to electrostatic complex and coacervate formation are the object of extensive research using both layer-by-layer and mixed emulsion approaches. The protein–polysaccharide conjugates demonstrated interesting physicochemical properties as stabilizers and emulsifiers, as well as texture modifiers in food products. Furthermore, they are potential optimal nutrient delivery systems. Their complex behavior due to several factors such as pH, ionic strength, concentration, heat, and mechanical treatments is the main reason behind the continuous growth of the research field. The review is reporting some recent advances on the topic, along with an overview of the possible interactions between protein and polysaccharide, from Maillard reaction to enzymatic cross-linking passing through coacervates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cocis.2020.03.002

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gentile, L.
Venue
Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
48
Pages
18-27
ISSN
1359-0294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012406960
Cited by
325
References
0
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.