Improving the oil sorption capability of porous polyurethane composites by the incorporation of cellulose fibers extracted from water hyacinth
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Similar water absorption phenomena were reported for pre-hydrolysed banana fibre-based polyurethane foam composites and porous polyurethane filled with cellulose fibres from water hyacinth.
“This phenomenon has also been reported by other authors [59,60] who tested 24 h water immersion of pre-hydrolysed banana fibres-based polyurethane foam composites, and the contact angle of porous polyurethane filled with cellulose fibres from water hyacinth, respectively.”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Augaitis, N., Vaitkus, S., Członka, S., & Kairytė, A. (2020) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma13235336 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sittinun, A., Pisitsak, P., & Ummartyotin, S.
- Affiliations
- Thammasat University (TH)
- Corresponding author
- Ummartyotin, S.
- Venue
- Composites Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 20
- Pages
- 100351
- ISSN
- 2452-2139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3022646861
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Composites Communications (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Thammasat University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
- Keywords
- oil adsorption, cellulose fibers, water hyacinth, fiber extraction, hydrophilicity, porosity, macropore volume, biocomposites, oil spill cleanup
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
