Polycystic ovary syndrome: Improving policies, awareness, and clinical care
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reported gaps in knowledge among health professionals are contributing to diagnostic delays and variations in care, perpetuating patient dissatisfaction and unmet information needs.
“Reported gaps in knowledge among health professionals [11,12,13,14] are contributing to diagnostic delays and variations in the care provided, perpetuating patient dissatisfaction and unmet information needs [15,16,17,18].”
From Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and the Internet of Things: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
Combined with a paucity of easily accessible and evidence-based information, patients are led to seek help through the internet, often from sources that are of low quality, unaccredited, inaccurate, and/or commercially driven.
“Combined with a paucity of easily accessible and evidence-based information, this is leading patients to seek help through the internet, often from sources that are of low quality, unaccredited, inaccurate, and/or commercially driven [16].”
From Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and the Internet of Things: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 20
- Authors
- Garad, R. M., & Teede, H. J.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Teede, Helena J.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Endocrine and Metabolic Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 112-118
- ISSN
- 2451-9650 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3018892375
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Endocrine and Metabolic Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Keywords
- polycystic ovary syndrome, PCOS awareness, health policy, clinical care, delayed diagnosis, evidence-based clinical guidelines, research translation, knowledge gaps, women's health, reproductive health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
