CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 30Social Representations and IdentityChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentPsychology of Development and Education

Individual differences in children's private speech: Consistency across tasks, timepoints, and contexts

Open access
Lidstone, Jane, Meins, Elizabeth, Fernyhough, Charles·2011·Cognitive Development
DOI 10.1016/j.cogdev.2011.02.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cogdev.2011.02.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies point to private speech being an almost universal feature of development, although there are important individual differences in frequency and quality of self-talk.

    “Most studies point to private speech being an almost universal feature of development (Winsler, De León, Wallace, Carlton, & Willson-Quayle, 2003), although there are important individual differences in frequency and quality of self-talk (Lidstone, Meins, & Fernyhough, 2011).”

    From Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015) · cites this paper as Lidstone, Meins, & Fernyhough, 2011

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 30

Authors
Lidstone, J., Meins, E., & Fernyhough, C.
Affiliations
Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Lidstone, Jane
ORCID
Venue
Cognitive Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
203-213
ISSN
0885-2014 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cogdev.2011.02.002
OpenAlex
W2066583502
Cited by
30
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Cognitive Development (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
Keywords
private speech, inner speech, individual differences, children, internalization, psychometric properties, numeracy, Tower of London, digit span

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review