Cited by 8Cognitive Functions and MemoryChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentMemory Processes and Influences

‘If-then’ but when? Effects of implementation intentions on children’s and adolescents’ prospective memory

Kretschmer-Trendowicz, Anett, Kliegel, Matthias, Goschke, Thomas, Altgassen, Mareike·2021·Cognitive Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100998

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kretschmer-Trendowicz, A., Kliegel, M., Goschke, T., & Altgassen, M.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Kretschmer-Trendowicz, Anett
Venue
Cognitive Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
57
Pages
100998
ISSN
0885-2014 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3122846502
Cited by
8
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Development (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
implementation intentions, prospective memory, children, adolescents, cognitive control, task significance, task switching, cognitive resources, encoding strategies, cognitive aging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review