The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Constraints on variables in syntax
Ross, J. R. (1967) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 4,102
Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies
Gibson, E. (1998) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00034-1 · Cited by 2,537
The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.676 · Cited by 2,259
Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction
Heath, J., Givón, T., & Givon, T. (1992) · Language · doi:10.2307/416859 · Cited by 1,941
Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00059-1 · Cited by 1,735
Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2558 · Cited by 1,604
The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(78)90002-1 · Cited by 1,400
Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading
Coltheart, M. (1987) · Cited by 1,195
Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1014 · Cited by 1,175
Self-citationThe independence of syntactic processing
Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C. (1986) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(86)90006-9 · Cited by 1,136
Cited by
An integrated theory of language production and comprehension
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12001495 · Cited by 1,569
What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?
Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016) · Language, Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299 · Cited by 1,087
Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication
Piantadosi, S. T., Tily, H., & Gibson, E. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1012551108 · Cited by 695
The communicative function of ambiguity in language
Piantadosi, S. T., Tily, H., & Gibson, E. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.004 · Cited by 628
Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review.
Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000158 · Cited by 518
Metadata
- Authors
- KAISER, E., & TRUESWELL, J.
- Venue
- Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-147
- ISSN
- 0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1964313175
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 3.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.002
- The paper
- KAISER, E., & TRUESWELL, J. (2004). The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language. Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
