Cited by 380Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage Development and DisordersReading and Literacy Development

Effect of language proficiency and executive control on verbal fluency performance in bilinguals

Luo, Lin, Luk, Gigi, Bialystok, Ellen·2010·Cognition

Abstract

We use a time-course analysis to examine the roles of vocabulary size and executive control in bilinguals' verbal fluency performance. Two groups of bilinguals and a group of monolingual adults were tested in English with verbal fluency subtests from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System. The two bilingual groups were equivalent in their self-rated English proficiency but differed in levels of receptive and expressive vocabulary. We hypothesized that the difference between the two bilingual groups in vocabulary and between the monolingual and bilingual groups in executive control would lead to differences in performance on the category and letter fluency tests and dissociate the roles of vocabulary knowledge and executive control in verbal production. Bilinguals and monolinguals performed equivalently in category fluency, but the high-vocabulary bilingual group outperformed both monolinguals and low-vocabulary bilinguals in letter fluency. An analysis of the retrieval time-course functions in letter fluency showed dissociable effects of resources available at the initiation of the trial, considered to reflect vocabulary size, and ability to monitor and retrieve new items using a novel phonemic-based word searching strategy, considered to reflect executive control. The difference in slope of the best-fitting curves reflected enhanced executive control for both bilingual groups compared to monolinguals, whereas the difference in the starting point of the logarithmic functions reflected higher levels of vocabulary for high-vocabulary bilinguals and monolinguals compared to low-vocabulary bilinguals. The results are discussed in terms of the contributions of linguistic resources and executive control to verbal performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bilinguals display consistent deficits on verbal fluency measures, especially semantic fluency, even if they may answer in either language.

    “Performance on these tasks reveals systematic deficits for bilingual participants, particularly in semantic fluency conditions [33–37], even if responses can be provided in either language [38].”

    From Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain (2012) · cites this paper as [35]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 380

Authors
Luo, L., Luk, G., & Bialystok, E.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • Rotman Research Institute (CA)
Corresponding author
Luo, Lin
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
114
Issue
1
Pages
29-41
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128088074
Cited by
380
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 23
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP57842)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
bilingualism, executive function, verbal fluency, vocabulary size, language proficiency, phonemic fluency, semantic fluency, word retrieval, Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System, time-course analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Language Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, Speech Perception, Time Factors, Verbal Behavior, Vocabulary, Multilingualism, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review