Cited by 73Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentCognitive Abilities and Testing

Qualitative change in executive control during childhood and adulthood

Open access
Chevalier, Nicolas, Huber, Kristina L., Wiebe, Sandra A., Espy, Kimberly Andrews·2013·Cognition

Abstract

Executive control development typically has been conceptualized to result from quantitative changes in the efficiency of the underlying processes. In contrast, the present study addressed the possibility of qualitative change with age by examining how children and adults detect task switches. Participants in three age groups (5- and 10-year-old children, young adults) completed two conditions of a cued task-switching paradigm where task cues were presented either in isolation or in conjunction with transition cues. Five-year-olds performed better with transition cues, whereas the reverse effect was observed at age 10 and with adults. Unlike 5-year-olds who detect switches after semantically processing cues, older participants strategically detect switches based on perceptual processing only. Age-related qualitative changes promote increasingly optimal adjustment of executive resources with age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.012

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of complex switching report inconsistent developmental trajectories, including a plateau at age 10 or 11-12, gradual improvement across the teenage years, or an inverted U in the teenage years.

    “with other studies suggesting a plateau at age 10 (Chelune and Baer, 1986; Chevalier et al., 2013; De Luca et al., 2003) or 11–12 (Huizinga et al., 2006; Huizinga and van der Molen, 2007; Somsen, 2007), gradual improvement across the teenage years (Crone et al., 2006; Crone et al., 2008), or an inverted U in the teenage years (van der Schaaf et al., 2011).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 73

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Chen Z Siegler RS Across the great divide: Bridging the gap between understanding of toddlers’ and older children’s thinking Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 2000 65 No. 2 (Whole No. 261) 12467094

Authors
Chevalier, N., Huber, K. L., Wiebe, S. A., & Espy, K. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Towson University (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Chevalier, Nicolas
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
128
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069559708
Cited by
73
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH065668, R01MH065668)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA024769, R01DA023653, DA023653, DA024769)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD038051, R01HD050309, HD050309, P01HD038051)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
executive function, task switching, qualitative change, developmental changes, children, adults, semantic processing, perceptual processing, age differences, cognitive development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aging, Child, Child, Preschool, Cues, Female, Form Perception, Humans, Male, Reaction Time, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review