Cited by 27Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsTactile and Sensory InteractionsLanguage, Metaphor, and Cognition

Conceptual processing is referenced to the experienced location of the self, not to the location of the physical body

Open access
Canzoneri, Elisa, di Pellegrino, Giuseppe, Herbelin, Bruno, Blanke, Olaf, Serino, Andrea·2016·Cognition

Abstract

We tested whether an experimentally induced change in the experienced location of the self by means of the Full Body Illusion (FBI) would impact high-level cognitive processing. In an implicit association task, participants saw a landscape where words, conveying spatial ("Near", "Far") or social ("Us", "Them") semantic distance appeared either in a proximal or distal position. Words' "semantic" distance was congruent or incongruent to the words' spatial position. Participants were asked to classify words' spatial position. Implicit association judgements were intermingled with sessions of visuo-tactile stimulation, during which participants were touched on their back, while viewing an avatar in the distal position being touched either synchronously or asynchronously. In a control experiment, participants performed the same task while observing a neutral object being touched, as a control. When subjects self-identified with the avatar presented at the distal position, the facilitation effect of the words' spatial-semantic congruency disappeared. The congruency effect did not disappear in case of asynchronous stimulation as well as in the control experiment with the object, where no change in self-identification was observed. These results demonstrate that conceptual processing is not referenced to the location of the physical body, but to the experienced location of the self.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 27

Authors
Canzoneri, E., di Pellegrino, G., Herbelin, B., Blanke, O., & Serino, A.
Affiliations
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Canzoneri, Elisa
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
154
Pages
182-192
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2475035620
Cited by
27
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
8.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognition (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Fondation Bertarelli
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Keywords
full-body illusion, body ownership, self-identification, conceptual processing, semantic distance, implicit associations, visuo-tactile stimulation, multisensory integration
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Image, Cognition, Distance Perception, Female, Humans, Illusions, Male, Reaction Time, Semantics, Visual Perception, Touch Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review