Cited by 81Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessGender and Technology in Education

What explains sex differences in math anxiety? A closer look at the role of spatial processing

Sokolowski, H. Moriah, Hawes, Zachary, Lyons, Ian M.·2019·Cognition

Abstract

A large body of research has documented that females experience more math anxiety than males. Researchers have identified many factors that might explain the relation between sex and math anxiety. In the current study, we present a novel theoretical framework that highlights the importance of examining multiple aspects of processing across different cognitive domains. We use this framework to address the question of what best explains sex differences in math anxiety. One hundred and seventy-five undergraduate students completed a battery of cognitive tasks and affect questionnaires intended to measure actual math ability, perceived math ability, math anxiety, actual spatial ability, perceived spatial ability, and anxiety about situations requiring spatial mental manipulation (spatial anxiety). Results revealed that processes within the spatial domain but not in the mathematical domain mediated the relation between sex and math anxiety, controlling for general anxiety and cognitive ability. Moreover, within the spatial domain, spatial anxiety was the strongest mediator between sex and math anxiety, over actual and perceived spatial ability. Our findings point to spatial anxiety as a key contributor to the commonly reported sex differences in math anxiety. We conclude by raising the possibility that sex differences in math anxiety, may be rooted in sex-related differences in anxiety about or avoidance of spatial strategies in solving mathematical tasks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.005

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sokolowski, H. M., Hawes, Z., & Lyons, I. M.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Georgetown University (US)
Corresponding author
Lyons, Ian M.
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
182
Pages
193-212
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2897574082
Cited by
81
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7
FWCI
5.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Western University
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
mathematics anxiety, sex differences, spatial anxiety, spatial ability, spatial processing, mediation, mathematical ability, gender differences in mathematics
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Aptitude, Female, Humans, Male, Self-Assessment, Sex Characteristics, Sex Factors, Space Perception, Mathematical Concepts, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review