A description–experience gap in statistical intuitions: Of smart babies, risk-savvy chimps, intuitive statisticians, and stupid grown-ups
Cites (209)
Items 201–209 of 209
- Confidence and the description–experience distinctionTomás Lejarraga, José Lejarraga · 2020 · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Nonverbal Probability Judgments by Young ChildrenPatricia A. Yost, Alberta Engvall Siegel, Julia McMichael Andrews · 1962 · Child Development
- Hold it! The influence of lingering rewards on choice diversification and persistence.Christin Schulze, Don van Ravenzwaaij, Ben Rhodri Newell · 2017 · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
- Children’s quantitative Bayesian inferences from natural frequencies and number of chancesStefania Pighin, Vittorio Girotto, Katya Tentori · 2017 · Cognition
- Better calibration when predicting from experience (rather than description)Adrian R. Camilleri, Ben Rhodri Newell · 2018 · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Expectations About Single Event Probabilities in the First Year of Life: The Influence of Perceptual and Statistical InformationChris A. Lawson, David H. Rakison · 2013 · Infancy
- Infants’ reasoning about samples generated by intentional versus non‐intentional agentsElizabeth Attisano, Stephanie Denison · 2019 · Infancy
- Principles of Economic Rationality in MiceMarion Rivalan, York Winter, Vladislav Nachev · 2017 · Scientific Reports
- Untitled workHertwig · 1999 · 10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(199912)12:4