Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) Protein-Rich Extract as a Natural Emulsifier for Oil-in-Water Emulsions: Optimization through a Sequential Experimental Design Strategy
Open accessAbstract
Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) proteins have been proven to present emulsifying properties. In this work, a Spirulina protein-rich extract obtained by ultrasound extraction (SpE) was tested to stabilize oil-in-water (O/W) emulsions. For this purpose, a sequential experimental design strategy (Fractional Factorial Design (FFD) 24–1 followed by a Central Composite Rotatable Design (CCRD) 22)) was applied. The effect of four variables, SpE concentration, O/W weight ratio, pH and storage time, on emulsions' zeta potential and number-mean droplet diameter was considered for the FFD 24–1, indicating SpE concentration and storage time as the relevant variables for the CCRD 22. According to zeta potential and number-mean droplet diameter evaluation, for the studied SpE concentration range (2–5 wt%), quite stable emulsions were obtained along the tested 30-days period. Even so, for 5%, visual inspection revealed extract segregation after 20-days. The optimal solution comprised 4 wt% of SpE, for an O/W weight ratio of 30/70 and a pH of 7.0 (number-mean droplet diameter of 55.66 nm and zeta potential of −43.83 mV). Overall, SpE has proven to be an excellent emulsifier, offering the potential to substitute animal-based proteins and synthetic emulsifiers. In addition, no signs of contamination by microorganisms were observed, suggesting that the SpE may also act as an antimicrobial agent.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Spirulina's functional properties depend on processing methods, pH levels, and whether Spirulina is fresh or dehydrated.
“These functional properties depend on processing methods, pH levels, and whether Spirulina is fresh or dehydrated [71].”
From Valorization of Microalgae as Multifunctional Protein Sources in Plant-Based Systems: Structural, Functional, and Processing Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [71]
Section 3.1.2 reports that the extract’s protein solubility, which affects its functional properties, varies with pH; it also reports changes in composition after processing. Sections 2.1 and 2.2 describe using dried biomass, but the paper does not compare the functional properties of fresh and dehydrated Spirulina. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredUltrasound-based extracts from defatted Spirulina biomass showed approximately 95% solubility across a pH range of 5-9.
“while ultrasound-based extracts from defatted Spirulina biomass showed approximately 95% solubility across a pH range of 5-9 [71].”
From Valorization of Microalgae as Multifunctional Protein Sources in Plant-Based Systems: Structural, Functional, and Processing Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [71]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 61
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Z. Cohen, The chemicals of spirulina, in: A. Vonshak (Ed.), Spirulina Platensis Physiol. Cell-Biology Biotechnol., Taylor & Francis, 2002, pp. 175-204, https:// doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2. · DOI
- S.U. Rawal, M.M. Patel, Lipid nanoparticulate systems: modern versatile drug carriers, in: Lipid Nanocarriers Drug Target, Elsevier Inc, 2018, pp. 49-138, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813687-4.00002-5. · DOI
- Authors
- Silva, S. C., Almeida, T., Colucci, G., Santamaria-Echart, A., Manrique, Y. A., Dias, M. M., Barros, L., Fernandes, Â., Colla, E., & Barreiro, M. F.
- Affiliations
- Universidade do Porto (PT)
- Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (BR)
- Universidade Politécnica de Bragança (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Barreiro, M. Filomena
- ORCID
- Venue
- Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 648
- Pages
- 129264
- ISSN
- 0927-7757 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4281398559
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 5.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (LA/P/0045/2020, UIDB/50020/2020, UIDP/50020/2020, SFRH/BD/148281/2019, UIDB/00690/2020, 05215)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization
- Keywords
- Spirulina platensis, natural emulsifiers, oil-in-water emulsions, emulsion stability, zeta potential, droplet size, storage time, pH effect, emulsifier replacement, antimicrobial activity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review