CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 74Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyAgricultural Science and Fertilization

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Changes in microbial community structure and function within particle size fractions of a paddy soil under different long-term fertilization treatments from the Tai Lake region, China

Zhang, Pingjiu, Zheng, Jufeng, Pan, Genxing, Zhang, Xuhui, Li, Lianqing, Rolf, Tippkötter·2007·Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
DOI 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.03.018
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Greenhouse gas (GHG) production and emission from paddy soils impacts global climate change. Soil particle size fractions (PSFs) of different sizes act as soil microhabitats for different kinds of microbial biota with varying conditions of redox reactions and soil organic matter (SOC) substrates. It is crucial to understand the distribution of soil microbial community structure within PSFs and linkage to the GHG production from paddy soils of China. The change of bacterial and methangenic archaeal community and activity relating to CH(4) and CO(2) production with PSFs under different fertilizer applications was studied in this paper. The fertilization trial was initiated in a paddy soil from the Tai Lake region, Jiangsu, China with four treatments of non-fertilized (NF), fertilized with inorganic fertilizers only (CF), inorganic with pig manure (CFM) and inorganic with straw return (CFS), respectively since 1987, and the PSFs (<2 microm, 2-20 microm, 20-200 microm, and 200-2000 microm) were separated by a low energy sonication dispersion procedure from undisturbed samples. Analysis of bacterial community within different size particles was conducted by PCR-DGGE. The results indicated significant variation of bacterial community structure within different PSFs. The methane was predominantly produced in the coarser fractions, while more species and higher diversity of bacteria survived in the size of <2 microm fractions, in which the bacterial community structure was more signi…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.03.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Rath, 2002, Ecosyst. Environ., 90, 319, 10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00031-2 · DOI
  2. Liou, 2003, Chemoshphere, 50, 237, 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00158-3 · DOI
  3. Zheng, 2006, Plant Nutr. Fertil. Sci., 12, 485
  4. Scheid, 2003, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 43, 309, 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2003.tb01071.x · DOI
  5. Marschner, 2003, Soil Biol. Biochem., 35, 453, 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00297-3 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Chen, 1998, Plant Nutr. Fertil. Sci., 4, 336
  7. Miller, 1995, Appl. Soil Ecol., 2, 253, 10.1016/0929-1393(95)00060-6 · DOI
  8. Schulten, 2000, Fertil. Soils, 30, 399, 10.1007/s003740050020 · DOI
  9. Six, 2000, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 681, 10.2136/sssaj2000.642681x · DOI
  10. Drury, 2004, Soil. Tillage Res., 79, 87, 10.1016/j.still.2004.03.020 · DOI
  11. Kandeler, 2000, Soil Biol. Biochem., 32, 390
  12. L.Q. Li, Ph.D. Dissertation, the Graduate School, Nanjing Agricultural University, 2001, p. 37.
  13. Väisänen, 2005, Soil Biol. Biochem., 37, 2007, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.02.037 · DOI
  14. Zhang, 2004, Acta Ecologica Sinica, 24, 2819
  15. Bronick, 2005, Soil Tillage Res., 81, 239, 10.1016/j.still.2004.09.011 · DOI
  16. Chotte, 2002, Soil Biol. Biochem., 34, 1083, 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00041-X · DOI
  17. Sessitsch, 2001, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 67, 4215, 10.1128/AEM.67.9.4215-4224.2001 · DOI
  18. Z.T. Gong, Scientific Press, Beijing, 1999, p. 114 (in Chinese).
  19. Pan, 2004, Global Change Biol., 10, 79, 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2003.00717.x · DOI
  20. Pan, 2005, Adv. Earth Sci., 20, 384
  21. Pan, 2005, J. Environ. Sci., 17, 1
  22. Cai, 1999, Soils, 5, 266
  23. Cao, 1996, Chemosphere, 33, 879, 10.1016/0045-6535(96)00231-7 · DOI
  24. Yan, 2003, Global Change Biol., 9, 237, 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00564.x · DOI
  25. Wang, 1999, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 29, 74, 10.1007/s003740050527 · DOI
  26. Xu, 2001, Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin, 10, 323
  27. Stemmer, 1998, Soil Biol. Biochem., 30, 9, 10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00093-X · DOI
  28. Watanabe, 2004, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 232, 153, 10.1016/S0378-1097(04)00045-X · DOI
  29. Nakatsu, 2000, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 64, 1382, 10.2136/sssaj2000.6441382x · DOI
  30. Eichner, 1999, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65, 102, 10.1128/AEM.65.1.102-109.1999 · DOI
  31. Hedrick, 2000, J. Microbiol. Methods, 41, 235, 10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00157-3 · DOI
  32. Zhou, 2002, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 68, 326, 10.1128/AEM.68.1.326-334.2002 · DOI
  33. Postma, 1990, Microb. Ecol., 19, 149, 10.1007/BF02012096 · DOI
  34. Oades, 1984, Plant Soil, 76, 319, 10.1007/BF02205590 · DOI
  35. Chen, 2003, Geoderma, 117, 129, 10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00160-5 · DOI
  36. Kiem, 2002, Org. Geochem., 33, 1683, 10.1016/S0146-6380(02)00113-4 · DOI
  37. Quenea, 2004, Org. Geochem., 35, 1355, 10.1016/S0146-6380(04)00123-8 · DOI
  38. Ding, 2006, Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 26, 293
  39. Chiu, 2006, Gerderma, 130, 265, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.01.025 · DOI
  40. Zhou, 2006, Plant Nutr. Fertil. Sci., 12, 765
  41. Ramakrishnan, 2000, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 32, 261, 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2000.tb00719.x · DOI
  42. Van den Pol-van Dasselaar, 1999, Soil Biol. Biochem., 31, 877, 10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00188-6 · DOI
  43. Whiting, 1993, Nature, 364, 794, 10.1038/364794a0 · DOI
  44. Spaccini, 2001, Biogeochemistry, 53, 1, 10.1023/A:1010714919306 · DOI
  45. L.Q. Li., X.H. Zhang, P.J. Zhang, G.X. Pan, J. Sci. Food Agric., in press.
  46. Yuan, 2004, Acta Ecologica Sinica, 24, 2961
  47. Krüger, 2005, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 51, 323, 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.09.004 · DOI
  48. Conrad, 2005, Soil Biol. Biochem., 37, 2099, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.03.012 · DOI
  49. Qiu, 2005, Soils Fertil., 4, 28

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, P., Zheng, J., Pan, G., Zhang, X., Li, L., & Rolf, T.
Affiliations
Nanjing Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Lianqing
ORCID
Venue
Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-08
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
264-270
ISSN
0927-7765 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.03.018
OpenAlex
W2060017460
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Colloids and Surfaces B Biointerfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
Keywords
paddy soil, soil microbial community structure, particle size fractions, soil microhabitats, methane production, CO2 production, methanogenic archaea, bacterial communities, long-term fertilization, mineral fertilizers, pig manure, straw incorporation, soil organic carbon, greenhouse gas emissions, Tai Lake region, soil microaggregates, pore size, redox conditions, soil carbon sequestration
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Carbon Dioxide, China, Methane, Particle Size, Soil Microbiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review