Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 593

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measurement and modelling of the laminar burning velocity of methane-ammonia-air flames at high pressures using a reduced reaction mechanism

Open access
Okafor, Ekenechukwu Chijioke, Naito, Yuji, Colson, Sophie, Ichikawa, Akinori, Kudo, Taku, Hayakawa, Akihiro, Kobayashi, Hideaki·2019·Combustion and Flame

Abstract

Abstract Ammonia and blends of ammonia with methane are gaining increased interest as fuels for gas turbine applications and hence optimized reduced reaction mechanisms for the fuels are required for the development of combustors. However, there is a scarcity of measured data on the laminar burning velocity of the fuels for optimizing and validating reaction mechanisms especially at high pressures. In this study, an extensive set of measurements of the unstretched laminar burning velocity and Markstein lengths of CH4 NH3-air flames at high pressures are reported for the first time and an optimized reduced reaction mechanism is proposed. The experiments were conducted in a constant volume chamber for various ammonia heat fractions in the fuel ranging from 0 to 0.30, equivalence ratios ranging from 0.7 to 1.3, and mixture pressures ranging from 0.10 to 0.50 MPa. The reduced reaction mechanism was developed from a detailed reaction mechanism for CH4 NH3-air flames by Okafor et al., and optimized against the present measurements and data in the literature. It is shown that the reduced mechanism models the unstretched laminar burning velocity of NH3/air and CH4 NH3-air flames with high fidelity at all studied conditions. It also models satisfactorily NH3, NO and CO concentration in CH4 NH3 O2 N2 oxidation in a laminar flow reactor. Furthermore, the reduced mechanism is demonstrated to predict NO, OH, and NH profiles in a premixed stagnation NH3-air flame satisfactorily. The experimental measurements were also used to validate selected detailed reaction mechanisms. It was found that the significant over-prediction of NO production from NH3 oxidation by GRI Mech 3.0 is primarily due to the influence of the reaction NH+H2O HNO+H2, which in fact may not be important in fuel NO chemistry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.03.008

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

See all 593

Metadata

Authors
Okafor, E. C., Naito, Y., Colson, S., Ichikawa, A., Kudo, T., Hayakawa, A., & Kobayashi, H.
Venue
Combustion and Flame
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
204
Pages
162-175
ISSN
0010-2180 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2922935816
Cited by
593
References
49
FWCI
19.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement and modelling of the laminar burning velocity of methane-ammonia-air flames at high pressures using a reduced reaction mechanism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.03.008
The paper
Okafor, E. C., Naito, Y., Colson, S., Ichikawa, A., Kudo, T., Hayakawa, A., & Kobayashi, H. (2019). Measurement and modelling of the laminar burning velocity of methane-ammonia-air flames at high pressures using a reduced reaction mechanism. Combustion and Flame. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.03.008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.