The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine Learning Models for Secure Data Analytics: A taxonomy and threat model
Abstract
Abstract In recent years, rapid technological advancements in smart devices and their usage in a wide range of applications exponentially increases the data generated from these devices. So, the traditional data analytics techniques may not be able to handle this extreme volume of data known as Big Data (BD) generated by different devices. However, this exponential increase of data opens the doors for the different type of attackers to launch various attacks by exploiting various vulnerabilities (SQL injection, OS fingerprinting, malicious code execution, etc.) during data analytics. Motivated from the aforementioned discussion, in this paper, we explored Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL)-based models and techniques which are capable off to identify and mitigate both the known as well as unknown attacks. ML and DL-based techniques have the capabilities to learn from the traffic pattern using training and testing datasets in the extensive network domains to make intelligent decisions concerning attack identification and mitigation. We also proposed a DL and ML-based Secure Data Analytics (SDA) architecture to classify normal or attack input data. A detailed taxonomy of SDA is abstracted into a threat model. This threat model addresses various research challenges in SDA using multiple parameters such as-efficiency, latency, accuracy, reliability, and attacks launched by the attackers. Finally, a comparison of existing SDA proposals with respect to various parameters is presented, which allows the end users to select one of the SDA proposals in comparison to its merits over the others.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering—A Systematic Literature Review
Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009 · Cited by 4,537
Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., & Khalil, M. (2007) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009 · Cited by 2,394
A Deep Learning Approach for Intrusion Detection Using Recurrent Neural Networks
Yin, C., Zhu, Y., Fei, J., & He, X. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2762418 · Cited by 2,100
Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learning
Yuan, X., He, P., Zhu, Q., & Li, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2018.2886017 · Cited by 1,733
Enhanced Network Anomaly Detection Based on Deep Neural Networks
Naseer, S., Saleem, Y., Khalid, S., Bashir, M. K., Han, J., Iqbal, M. M., & Han, K. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2863036 · Cited by 507
Real-time big data processing for anomaly detection: A survey
Ariyaluran Habeeb, R. A., Nasaruddin, F., Gani, A., Targio Hashem, I. A., Ahmed, E., & Imran, M. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.08.006 · Cited by 487
Cited by
Kumar, P., Gupta, G. P., & Tripathi, R. (2021) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2020.12.003 · Cited by 316
A Deep Learning-based Cryptocurrency Price Prediction Scheme for Financial Institutions
Patel, M. M., Tanwar, S., Gupta, R., & Kumar, N. (2020) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2020.102583 · Cited by 282
Self-citationInternet of Things: Evolution, Concerns and Security Challenges
Malhotra, P., Singh, Y., Anand, P., Bangotra, D. K., Singh, P. K., & Hong, W.-C. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21051809 · Cited by 260
Kumari, A., Gupta, R., Tanwar, S., & Kumar, N. (2020) · Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing · doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2020.05.004 · Cited by 172
Self-citationFacial Sentiment Analysis Using AI Techniques: State-of-the-Art, Taxonomies, and Challenges
Patel, K., Mehta, D., Mistry, C., Gupta, R., Tanwar, S., Kumar, N., & Alazab, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2993803 · Cited by 157
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupta, R., Tanwar, S., Tyagi, S., & Kumar, N.
- Venue
- Computer Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 153
- Pages
- 406-440
- ISSN
- 0140-3664 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3006558576
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 17.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.