Cited by 161Machine Learning in Materials ScienceMaterial Selection and PropertiesRecycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production

Enhancing property prediction and process optimization in building materials through machine learning: A review

Open access
Stergiou, Konstantinos, Ntakolia, Charis, Varytis, Paris, Koumoulos, Elias, Karlsson, Patrik, Moustakidis, Serafeim·2023·Computational Materials Science

Abstract

Analysis and design, as the most critical components in material science, require a highly rigorous approach to assure long-term success. Due to a recent increase in the amount of available experimental data, large databases now contain a depth of knowledge on important properties of materials. The use of this information, combined with Machine Learning (ML) solutions, can enhance the materials’ manufacturing process and efficiency. Indeed, ML can predict material properties, minimize the time and cost of laboratory testing, as well as optimize critical manufacturing processes. This paper aims to give an up-to-date review of the literature on how ML models are used to predict buildings’ material properties (thermal, mechanical, and optical) and optimize the production lines for: a) Phase Change Materials (PCMs), b) Thermoelectric generators (TEGs), c) Customizable 3D-components, d) Advanced cement/concrete-based materials, e) Aerogels, f) Insulation components made from waste materials, g) Multifunctional component materials (MCs), h) Solar active building envelopes (SAE), i) Omniphobic coatings. The review showed that ML-driven approaches for materials’ properties prediction in buildings and process optimization have grown rapidly, providing information and insights that can be utilized in the industry to maximize the materials’ production and efficiency while reducing CO2 emissions, resulting in a more productive and environmentally friendly era.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112031

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stergiou, K., Ntakolia, C., Varytis, P., Koumoulos, E., Karlsson, P., & Moustakidis, S.
Affiliations
Hellenic Air Force Academy (GR)
Corresponding author
Moustakidis, Serafeim
Venue
Computational Materials Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
220
Pages
112031
ISSN
0927-0256 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4317940854
Cited by
161
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 33
FWCI
11.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Computational Materials Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Material Selection and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production
Keywords
machine learning, building materials, property prediction, production process optimization, phase change materials, thermoelectric generators, 3D-printed parts, cement and concrete, aerogels, multifunctional materials, omniphobic coatings, thermal properties, mechanical properties, optical properties, CO2 emission reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review