The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A survey on the computation offloading approaches in mobile edge computing: A machine learning-based perspective
Abstract
Abstract With the rapid developments in emerging mobile technologies, utilizing resource-hungry mobile applications such as media processing, online Gaming, Augmented Reality (AR), and Virtual Reality (VR) play an essential role in both businesses and entertainments. To soften the burden of such complexities incurred by fast developments of such serving technologies, distributed Mobile Edge Computing (MEC) has been developed, aimed at bringing the computation environments near the end-users, usually in one hop, to reach predefined requirements. In the literature, offloading approaches are developed to connect the computation environments to mobile devices by transferring resource-hungry tasks to the near servers. Because of some rising problems such as inherent software and hardware heterogeneity, restrictions, dynamism, and stochastic behavior of the ecosystem, the computation offloading issues consider as the essential challenging problems in the MEC environment. However, to the best of the author's knowledge, in spite of its significance, in machine learning-based (ML-based) computation offloading mechanisms, there is not any systematic, comprehensive, and detailed survey in the MEC environment. In this paper, we provide a review on the ML-based computation offloading mechanisms in the MEC environment in the form of a classical taxonomy to identify the contemporary mechanisms on this crucial topic and to offer open issues as well. The proposed taxonomy is classified into three main fields: Reinforcement learning-based mechanisms, supervised learning-based mechanisms, and unsupervised learning-based mechanisms. Next, these classes are compared with each other based on the essential features such as performance metrics, case studies, utilized techniques, and evaluation tools, and their advantages and weaknesses are discussed, as well. Finally, open issues and uncovered or inadequately covered future research challenges are argued, and the survey is concluded.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mobile Edge Computing: A Survey on Architecture and Computation Offloading
Mach, P., & Becvar, Z. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2682318 · Cited by 3,258
Gupta, H., Vahid Dastjerdi, A., Ghosh, S. K., & Buyya, R. (2017) · Software: Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/spe.2509 · Cited by 1,649
Learning IoT in Edge: Deep Learning for the Internet of Things with Edge Computing
Li, H., Ota, K., & Dong, M. (2018) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.2018.1700202 · Cited by 1,566
Mobile edge computing, Fog et al.: A survey and analysis of security threats and challenges
Roman, R., Lopez, J., & Mambo, M. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2016.11.009 · Cited by 1,338
Chen, X., Zhang, H., Wu, C., Mao, S., Ji, Y., & Bennis, M. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2876279 · Cited by 680
He, Y., Zhao, N., & Yin, H. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2017.2760281 · Cited by 569
Learning-Based Computation Offloading for IoT Devices With Energy Harvesting
Min, M., Xiao, L., Chen, Y., Cheng, P., Wu, D., & Zhuang, W. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2018.2890685 · Cited by 560
Deep reinforcement learning based computation offloading and resource allocation for MEC
Li, J., Gao, H., Lv, T., & Lu, Y. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2018.8377343 · Cited by 548
EdgeCloudSim: An environment for performance evaluation of edge computing systems
Sonmez, C., Ozgovde, A., & Ersoy, C. (2018) · Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies · doi:10.1002/ett.3493 · Cited by 427
Cited by
AI for next generation computing: Emerging trends and future directions
Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Ottaviani, C., Patros, P., Bahsoon, R., Shaghaghi, A., Golec, M., Stankovski, V., Wu, H., Abraham, A., et al. (2022) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2022.100514 · Cited by 686
Single and multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for AI-enabled wireless networks: A tutorial
Feriani, A., & Hossain, E. (2021) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3063822 · Cited by 410
Liu, B., Luo, Z., Chen, H., & Li, C. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3176106 · Cited by 36
Distributed resource scheduling in edge computing: Problems, solutions, and opportunities
Sahni, Y., Cao, J., Yang, L., & Wang, S. (2022) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109430 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Shakarami, A., Ghobaei-Arani, M., & Shahidinejad, A.
- Venue
- Computer Networks
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 182
- Pages
- 107496
- ISSN
- 1389-1286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3081088023
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 115
- FWCI
- 23.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A survey on the computation offloading approaches in mobile edge computing: A machine learning-based perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107496
- The paper
- Shakarami, A., Ghobaei-Arani, M., & Shahidinejad, A. (2020). A survey on the computation offloading approaches in mobile edge computing: A machine learning-based perspective. Computer Networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107496
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.