Partial least square with discriminant analysis and near infrared spectroscopy for evaluation of geographic and genotypic origin of arabica coffee
Abstract
The agronomic practices and environmental conditions for coffee cultivation, such as climate, soil type and altitude, promote influence in the final chemical composition of the grain. Furthermore, the genotype directly influences the essential features of the beverage, increasing its aggregate price. Proof of geographic and genotypic origin of the coffee genotype must be done using reliable methods. Thus, near infrared spectroscopy (NIR) was used to analyze different coffee genotypes that were cultivated in Brazil. Due to complexity and quantity of information within the spectra, partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were applied to analyze the NIR data. The multiplicative scatter correction (MSC) and the Savitzky–Golay second-derivative were tested as preprocessing techniques to find which one provides an appropriate identification model. The best model achieved correctly identified 94.4% of validation samples for both geographic and genotypic origin. The results demonstrate that NIR spectroscopy provides significant analytical data to be used in tandem with PLS-DA to distinguish green coffee samples geographically and genotypically.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The most recent ways involving classification using hyperspectral data include extreme learning machine (ELM), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), and various deep learning algorithms.
“The most recent ways involving classification using hyperspectral data include extreme learning machine (ELM) [7–9], partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) [10,11], and various deep learning algorithms [12,13].”
From Development of online classification system for construction waste based on industrial camera and hyperspectral camera (2019) · cites this paper as [11]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Xiao, W., Yang, J., Fang, H., Zhuang, J., & Ku, Y. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208706 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Marquetti, I., Link, J. V., Lemes, A. L. G., Scholz, M. B. D. S., Valderrama, P., & Bona, E.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (BR)
- Instituto Agronômico do Paraná (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Bona, Evandro
- Venue
- Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 121
- Pages
- 313-319
- ISSN
- 0168-1699 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2237314438
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 10.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers and Electronics in Agriculture (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- CAPES
- CNPq
- Embrapa Café and Fundação Araucária
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
- Keywords
- Coffea arabica, geographical origin, near-infrared spectroscopy, PLS-DA, green coffee beans, multiplicative scatter correction, spectral preprocessing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review