The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automatic plant disease diagnosis using mobile capture devices, applied on a wheat use case
Open accessAbstract
Automatic Plant disease diagnosis for early disease symptoms.Novel image processing algorithm in combination with machine learning inference methods.A performance testing on wheat was done with 7 mobile devices over 3 seasons.Obtained results reveal AuC metrics higher than 0.80 for all the analyzed diseases. Disease diagnosis based on the detection of early symptoms is a usual threshold taken into account for integrated pest management strategies. Early phytosanitary treatment minimizes yield losses and increases the efficacy and efficiency of the treatments. However, the appearance of new diseases associated to new resistant crop variants complicates their early identification delaying the application of the appropriate corrective actions. The use of image based automated identification systems can leverage early detection of diseases among farmers and technicians but they perform poorly under real field conditions using mobile devices. A novel image processing algorithm based on candidate hot-spot detection in combination with statistical inference methods is proposed to tackle disease identification in wild conditions. This work analyses the performance of early identification of three European endemic wheat diseases septoria, rust and tan spot. The analysis was done using 7 mobile devices and more than 3500 images captured in two pilot sites in Spain and Germany during 2014, 2015 and 2016. Obtained results reveal AuC (Area under the Receiver Operating CharacteristicROCCurve) metrics higher than 0.80 for all the analyzed diseases on the pilot tests under real conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An introduction to ROC analysis
Fawcett, T. (2006) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 · Cited by 21,879
Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns
Ojala, T., Pietikainen, M., & Maenpaa, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2002.1017623 · Cited by 15,398
Chan, T. F., & Vese, L. A. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/83.902291 · Cited by 10,304
SLIC Superpixels Compared to State-of-the-Art Superpixel Methods
Achanta, R., Shaji, A., Smith, K., Lucchi, A., Fua, P., & Süsstrunk, S. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.120 · Cited by 9,201
The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms
Bradley, A. P. (1997) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/s0031-3203(96)00142-2 · Cited by 7,217
Efficient Graph-Based Image Segmentation
Felzenszwalb, P. F., & Huttenlocher, D. P. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000022288.19776.77 · Cited by 6,176
OERKE, E.-C. (2006) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859605005708 · Cited by 5,283
Using Deep Learning for Image-Based Plant Disease Detection
Mohanty, S. P., Hughes, D. P., & Salathé, M. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01419 · Cited by 5,026
Land, E. H., & McCann, J. J. (1971) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.61.000001 · Cited by 4,095
Naive (Bayes) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval
Lewis, D. D. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0026666 · Cited by 2,104
Cited by
Deep learning models for plant disease detection and diagnosis
Ferentinos, K. P. (2018) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2018.01.009 · Cited by 3,390
New perspectives on plant disease characterization based on deep learning
Lee, S. H., Goëau, H., Bonnet, P., & Joly, A. (2020) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105220 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Johannes, A., Picon, A., Alvarez-Gila, A., Echazarra, J., Rodriguez-Vaamonde, S., Navajas, A. D., & Ortiz-Barredo, A.
- Venue
- Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 138
- Pages
- 200-209
- ISSN
- 0168-1699 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2612844455
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 21.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automatic plant disease diagnosis using mobile capture devices, applied on a wheat use case. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compag.2017.04.013
- The paper
- Johannes, A., Picon, A., Alvarez-Gila, A., Echazarra, J., Rodriguez-Vaamonde, S., Navajas, A. D., & Ortiz-Barredo, A. (2017). Automatic plant disease diagnosis using mobile capture devices, applied on a wheat use case. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.04.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.