Cited by 1,043Smart Agriculture and AIAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection

Apple detection during different growth stages in orchards using the improved YOLO-V3 model

Tian, Yunong, Yang, Guodong, Wang, Zhe, Wang, Hao, Li, En, Liang, Zize·2019·Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

Abstract

Real-time detection of apples in orchards is one of the most important methods for judging growth stages of apples and estimating yield. The size, colour, cluster density, and other growth characteristics of apples change as they grow. Traditional detection methods can only detect apples during a particular growth stage, but these methods cannot be adapted to different growth stages using the same model. We propose an improved YOLO-V3 model for detecting apples during different growth stages in orchards with fluctuating illumination, complex backgrounds, overlapping apples, and branches and leaves. Images of young apples, expanding apples, and ripe apples are initially collected. These images are subsequently augmented using rotation transformation, colour balance transformation, brightness transformation, and blur processing. The augmented images are used to create training sets. The DenseNet method is used to process feature layers with low resolution in the YOLO-V3 network. This effectively enhances feature propagation, promotes feature reuse, and improves network performance. After training the model, the performance of the trained model is tested on a test dataset. The test results show that the proposed YOLOV3-dense model is superior to the original YOLO-V3 model and the Faster R-CNN with VGG16 net model, which is the state-of-art fruit detection model. The average detection time of the model is 0.304s per frame at 3000 × 3000 resolution, which can provide real-time detection of apples in orchards. Moreover, the YOLOV3-dense model can effectively provide apple detection under overlapping apples and occlusion conditions, and can be applied in the actual environment of orchards.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compag.2019.01.012

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tian, Y., Yang, G., Wang, Z., Wang, H., Li, E., & Liang, Z.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, En
Venue
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
157
Pages
417-426
ISSN
0168-1699 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2909494862
Cited by
1,043
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 134 · 2024: 193 · 2023: 198 · 2022: 188 · 2021: 148 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 19
FWCI
82.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Basic Research Program of China (2017YFD0701401)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Keywords
apple detection, orchards, YOLOv3, DenseNet, fruit development stages, real-time object detection, image augmentation, yield estimation, object detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review