The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 148 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of computer vision technologies for plant phenotyping
Abstract
Abstract Plant phenotype plays an important role in genetics, botany, and agronomy, while the currently popular methods for phenotypic trait measurement have some limitations in aspects of cost, performance, and space-time coverage. With the rapid development of imaging technology, computing power, and algorithms, computer vision has thoroughly revolutionized the plant phenotyping and is now a major tool for phenotypic analysis. Based on the above reasons, researchers are devoted to developing image-based plant phenotyping methods as a complementary or even alternative to the manual measurement. However, the use of computer vision technology to analyze plant phenotypic traits can be affected by many factors such as research environment, imaging system, research object, feature extraction, model selection, and so on. Currently, there is no review paper to compare and analyze these methods thoroughly. Therefore, this review introduces the typical plant phenotyping methods based on computer vision in detail, with their principle, applicable range, results, and comparison. This paper extensively reviews 200+ papers of plant phenotyping in the light of its technical evolution, spanning over twenty years (from 2000 to 2020). A number of topics have been covered in this paper, including imaging technologies, plant datasets, and state-of-the-art phenotyping methods. In this review, we categorize the plant phenotyping into two main groups: plant organ phenotyping and whole-plant phenotyping. Furthermore, for each group, we analyze each research of these groups and discuss the limitations of the current approaches and future research directions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(1993) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.1993 · Cited by 17,667
Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision
(1995) · Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.1995.466933 · Cited by 12,860
Using Deep Learning for Image-Based Plant Disease Detection
Mohanty, S. P., Hughes, D. P., & Salathé, M. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.01419 · Cited by 5,026
He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollar, P., & Girshick, R. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2018.2844175 · Cited by 3,457
Deep learning models for plant disease detection and diagnosis
Ferentinos, K. P. (2018) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2018.01.009 · Cited by 3,390
The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants
Prusinkiewicz, P., & Lindenmayer, A. (1990) · The Virtual Laboratory · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8476-2 · Cited by 2,823
PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentation
Qi, C. R., Su, H., Mo, K., & Guibas, L. J. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.00593 · Cited by 2,817
Automatic Panoramic Image Stitching using Invariant Features
Brown, M., & Lowe, D. G. (2007) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-006-0002-3 · Cited by 2,665
YOLACT: Real-Time Instance Segmentation
Bolya, D., Zhou, C., Xiao, F., & Lee, Y. J. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00925 · Cited by 2,536
PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detection
Shi, S., Guo, C., Jiang, L., Wang, Z., Shi, J., Wang, X., & Li, H. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01054 · Cited by 2,341
Cited by
Recognition of rice leaf diseases and wheat leaf diseases based on multi-task deep transfer learning
Jiang, Z., Dong, Z., Jiang, W., & Yang, Y. (2021) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2021.106184 · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Z., Guo, R., Li, M., Chen, Y., & Li, G.
- Venue
- Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 176
- Pages
- 105672
- ISSN
- 0168-1699 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3047532279
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 148
- FWCI
- 24.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of computer vision technologies for plant phenotyping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105672
- The paper
- Li, Z., Guo, R., Li, M., Chen, Y., & Li, G. (2020). A review of computer vision technologies for plant phenotyping. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105672
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.