Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 391

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 148 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review of computer vision technologies for plant phenotyping

Li, Zhenbo, Guo, Ruohao, Li, Meng, Chen, Yaru, Li, Guangyao·2020·Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

Abstract

Abstract Plant phenotype plays an important role in genetics, botany, and agronomy, while the currently popular methods for phenotypic trait measurement have some limitations in aspects of cost, performance, and space-time coverage. With the rapid development of imaging technology, computing power, and algorithms, computer vision has thoroughly revolutionized the plant phenotyping and is now a major tool for phenotypic analysis. Based on the above reasons, researchers are devoted to developing image-based plant phenotyping methods as a complementary or even alternative to the manual measurement. However, the use of computer vision technology to analyze plant phenotypic traits can be affected by many factors such as research environment, imaging system, research object, feature extraction, model selection, and so on. Currently, there is no review paper to compare and analyze these methods thoroughly. Therefore, this review introduces the typical plant phenotyping methods based on computer vision in detail, with their principle, applicable range, results, and comparison. This paper extensively reviews 200+ papers of plant phenotyping in the light of its technical evolution, spanning over twenty years (from 2000 to 2020). A number of topics have been covered in this paper, including imaging technologies, plant datasets, and state-of-the-art phenotyping methods. In this review, we categorize the plant phenotyping into two main groups: plant organ phenotyping and whole-plant phenotyping. Furthermore, for each group, we analyze each research of these groups and discuss the limitations of the current approaches and future research directions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105672

Cites

148 of 148 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 148 references

Cited by

See all 391

Metadata

Authors
Li, Z., Guo, R., Li, M., Chen, Y., & Li, G.
Venue
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
176
Pages
105672
ISSN
0168-1699 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3047532279
Cited by
391
References
148
FWCI
24.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of computer vision technologies for plant phenotyping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105672
The paper
Li, Z., Guo, R., Li, M., Chen, Y., & Li, G. (2020). A review of computer vision technologies for plant phenotyping. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105672

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.