Applications of deep learning in precision weed management: A review
Open accessAbstract
Deep Learning (DL) has been described as one of the key subfields of Artificial Intelligence (AI) that is transforming weed detection for site-specific weed management (SSWM). In the last demi-decade, DL techniques have been integrated with ground as well as aerial-based technologies to identify weeds in still image context and real-time setting. After observing the current research trend in DL-based weed detection, techniques are advancing by assisting precision weeding technologies to make smart decisions. Therefore, the objective of this paper was to present a systematic review study that involves DL-based weed detection techniques and technologies available for SSWM. To accomplish this study, a comprehensive literature survey was performed that consists of 60 closest technical papers on DL-based weed detection. The key findings are summarized as follows, a) transfer learning approach is a widely adopted technique to address weed detection in majority of research work, b) less focus navigated towards custom designed neural networks for weed detection task, c) based on the pretrained models deployed on test dataset, no one specific model can be attributed to have achieved high accuracy on multiple field images pertaining to several research studies, d) inferencing DL models on resource-constrained edge devices with limited number of dataset is lagging, e) different versions of YOLO (mostly v3) is a widely adopted model for detecting weeds in real-time scenario, f) SegNet and U-Net models have been deployed to accomplish semantic segmentation task in multispectral aerial imagery, g) less number of open-source weed image dataset acquired using drones, h) lack of research in exploring optimization and generalization techniques for weed identification in aerial images, i) research in exploring ways to design models that consume less training hours, low-power consumption and less parameters during training or inferencing, and j) slow-moving advances in optimizing models based on domain adaptation approach. In conclusion, this review will help researchers, DL experts, weed scientists, farmers, and technology extension specialist to gain updates in the area of DL techniques and technologies available for SSWM.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This level of precision is invaluable for farmers managing orchards, as it enables better decision-making regarding harvesting and pest control.
“This level of precision is invaluable for farmers managing orchards, as it enables better decision-making regarding harvesting and pest control [108].”
From The YOLO Framework: A Comprehensive Review of Evolution, Applications, and Benchmarks in Object Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [108]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 148 · Cited by 218
- Authors
- Rai, N., Zhang, Y., Ram, B. G., Schumacher, L., Yellavajjala, R. K., Bajwa, S., & Sun, X.
- Affiliations
- North Dakota State University (US)
- Montana State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sun, Xin
- Venue
- Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 206
- Pages
- 107698
- ISSN
- 0168-1699 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4319949132
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 148
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 28
- FWCI
- 34.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers and Electronics in Agriculture (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture (ND01487)
- USDA ARS (58-6064-8-023)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
- Keywords
- deep learning, weed detection, site-specific weed management, precision weeding, transfer learning, YOLO, semantic segmentation, SegNet, U-Net, multispectral aerial imagery, UAV imagery, edge devices, domain adaptation, real-time weed detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review