Cited by 72Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

Prediction of metabolic syndrome using artificial neural network system based on clinical data including insulin resistance index and serum adiponectin

Hirose, Hiroshi, Takayama, Tetsuro, Hozawa, Shigenari, Hibi, Toshifumi, Saito, Ikuo·2011·Computers in Biology and Medicine

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to predict the 6-year incidence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) using an artificial neural network (ANN) system and multiple logistic regression (MLR) analysis based on clinical factors, including the insulin resistance index calculated by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR). Design Subjects were recruited from participants in annual health check-ups in both 2000 and 2006. A total of 410 Japanese male teachers and other workers at Keio University, 30-59 years of age at baseline, participated in this retrospective cohort study. Measurements Clinical parameters were randomly divided into a training dataset and a validation dataset, and the ANN system and MLR analysis were applied to predict individual incidences. The leave some out cross validation method was used for validation. Results The sensitivity of the prediction was 0.27 for the MLR model and 0.93 for the ANN system, while specificities were 0.95 and 0.91, respectively. Sensitivity analysis employing the ANN system identified BMI, age, diastolic blood pressure, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and HOMA-IR as important predictors, suggesting these factors to be non-linearly related to the outcome. Conclusion We successfully predicted the 6-year incidence of MetS using an ANN system based on clinical data, including HOMA-IR and serum adiponectin, in Japanese male subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.09.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 72

Authors
Hirose, H., Takayama, T., Hozawa, S., Hibi, T., & Saito, I.
Affiliations
Keio University (JP)
Corresponding author
Hirose, Hiroshi
Venue
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
41
Issue
11
Pages
1051-1056
ISSN
0010-4825 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091741434
Cited by
72
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers in Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Keio University
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
metabolic syndrome, incidence forecasting, artificial neural networks, HOMA-IR, insulin resistance, adiponectin, serum adiponectin, risk factors, body mass index, diastolic blood pressure, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, Japanese men
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Japan, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Body Mass Index, Logistic Models, Neural Networks, Computer, Metabolic Syndrome, Asian People, Adiponectin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review