Prediction of metabolic syndrome using artificial neural network system based on clinical data including insulin resistance index and serum adiponectin
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to predict the 6-year incidence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) using an artificial neural network (ANN) system and multiple logistic regression (MLR) analysis based on clinical factors, including the insulin resistance index calculated by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR). Design Subjects were recruited from participants in annual health check-ups in both 2000 and 2006. A total of 410 Japanese male teachers and other workers at Keio University, 30-59 years of age at baseline, participated in this retrospective cohort study. Measurements Clinical parameters were randomly divided into a training dataset and a validation dataset, and the ANN system and MLR analysis were applied to predict individual incidences. The leave some out cross validation method was used for validation. Results The sensitivity of the prediction was 0.27 for the MLR model and 0.93 for the ANN system, while specificities were 0.95 and 0.91, respectively. Sensitivity analysis employing the ANN system identified BMI, age, diastolic blood pressure, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and HOMA-IR as important predictors, suggesting these factors to be non-linearly related to the outcome. Conclusion We successfully predicted the 6-year incidence of MetS using an ANN system based on clinical data, including HOMA-IR and serum adiponectin, in Japanese male subjects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Traditional medical diagnostics rely heavily on blood sampling, which is invasive and poses discomfort and risks to patients.
“Traditional medical diagnostics rely heavily on blood sampling to assess metabolite levels and enzyme activities, which, while accurate, is invasive and poses discomfort and risks to patients [5, 6].”
From Machine learning with the body roundness index and associated indicators: a new approach to predicting metabolic syndrome (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 72
- Authors
- Hirose, H., Takayama, T., Hozawa, S., Hibi, T., & Saito, I.
- Affiliations
- Keio University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Hirose, Hiroshi
- Venue
- Computers in Biology and Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1051-1056
- ISSN
- 0010-4825 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091741434
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Biology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Keio University
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
- Keywords
- metabolic syndrome, incidence forecasting, artificial neural networks, HOMA-IR, insulin resistance, adiponectin, serum adiponectin, risk factors, body mass index, diastolic blood pressure, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, Japanese men
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Japan, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Body Mass Index, Logistic Models, Neural Networks, Computer, Metabolic Syndrome, Asian People, Adiponectin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review